Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 5)

[375 
axial 
right 
some 
A 2 ? +1 , (2q + 1) X 2 ; A 2 ?, qL 2 , qL' 2 ; A 2 ?, 2qL\ 
12. The meaning of the rotation symbol is as follows : viz. if in general we have 
a rotation 6 about an axis inclined at the angles X, Y, Z to any three rectangular 
axes, and if II be the rotation symbol, 
n = cos 16 + sin 6 (i cos X +j cos Y + k cos Z), 
then if x, y, z are the original coordinates of any point of the body, and x', y', z' the 
coordinates of the same point after the rotation ; the values of x', y', z' are given in 
terms of x, y, z by the formula 
ix' +jy' + kz' = II (ix +jy + kz) II -1 . 
This is in fact the form under which, in the paper “ On certain results relating to 
Quaternions,” Phil. Mag., voi. xxvi. (1845), p. 141, [20], I exhibited the rotation formulas 
of Euler and Rodrigues. See also my paper “ On the application of Quaternions to 
the Theory of Rotation,” Phil. Mag., voi. xxxm. (1848), p. 196, [68]. 
We have, it is clear, 
IP = cos s9 + sin s9 (i cos X +j cos Y+k cos Z) 
which shows that II s is the symbol for the rotation II repeated s times : (more 
generally performing on the body, first the rotation II and then the rotation P about 
any axis, the same or different, the symbol of the resultant rotation is = PII). If II 
2^ 
be the symbol for a rotation through the angle —, then the rotation which corre 
sponds to the symbol II? is a rotation through 360°, that is the body returns to its 
original position ; it might at first sight appear that we ought to have II? = 1, and 
that the symbols 1, II, II 2 , ... II? -1 would form a group; this however is not so, for 
we have not II? = 1, but II? = — 1 ; in fact, it is to be observed that to pass from 
ix +jy + kz to ix +jy' + kz', we have to multiply by II ( ) II -1 , so that the symbol of 
the rotation is indifferently ± II, and that the rotation symbol — 1 is thus equivalent 
to the rotation symbol +1. But as regards the formation of the group, the only 
difference is that it is not 1, II, II 2 , ... II? -1 which form a group of q symbols, but 
+ 1, ± II, + II 2 , ... i n? _1 which form a group of 2q symbols. And so in the axial 
system of any polyhedron, if II be the rotation symbol of any ^-axis, then taking for 
each axis of the polyhedron the set of symbols ± II, + II 2 , ... + II?- 1 , and besides the 
two symbols ± 1, the whole series of symbols form together a group. 
14. Thus in the before-mentioned case B(q = 2) we have the eight symbols 
± 1, ± % ±j, ± k
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.