Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 5)

383] PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS, 
569 
but, in virtue of the relations 
(p-Pif = - %ppi + (p 2 +Pi% &c., 
this equation is identically true, and the subsidiary theorem is thus proved. 
Passing now to the general theorem, I prove the first part of it as follows: 
The equation of a conic circumscribed about the triangle x = 0, y = 0, z = 0 is 
the conic, we have 
and thence 
ABC 
H : 
a P 7 
A 
B 
(7 
— 
3 h 
— = 
X 
y 
z 
/3", 
7") are 
A 
B 
C _ 
-f 'ft, H" 
/ ” 
a! 
/3 
7 
1 
1 
1 
a 
’ ¡9 ’ 
7 
1 
1 
1 
a' 
’ w 
7 
1 
1 
1 
a" 
’ /8"’ 
// 
7 
A B C_ 
a" W 
= 0, 
which is the condition for the intersection in a point of the three lines 
x y z _ 
- + | + - = °> 
« Æ 7 
# y z 
> + J57 H 7 — 0> 
« P 7 
X y z _ 
1- — -1 = 0 • 
a /3" 7" ’ 
and the theorem in question is thus proved. I remark, in passing, that the theorem 
might also be stated as follows :—The locus of a point 0, such that its polar in 
regard to the triangle ABC passes through a fixed point il, is a conic circumscribed 
about the triangle. 
To prove the second part of the theorem, take for the coordinates of the points 
0, O', 0" respectively (a, /3, 7), (a', /3', y), (a", ¡3", 7") ; then 
= 0, 
c. V. 
72
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.