Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 5)

PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS. 
574 
[383 
which is the required equation; or, transforming to the original axes, we have x + iy — X, 
x — iy = F, &c., and therefore XY = x 2 + y' 2 ; and the equation becomes 
x 2 + y 2 4-1 , x + iy 
x — iy 
= 0, 
+ «2 + i (ßi + ß 2 ), (cq + ißß (a2 + î/3 2 ), 1 
a 3 + a 4 + i (ß 3 + ß 4 \ (a 3 + iß 3 ) (a 4 + iß 4 ), 1 
which is the equation of the circle through the two pairs of antifocal points. 
{Note. The second form of the equation of the circle may be otherwise deduced 
from the first, without expanding the determinants, by the following method: 
XY, 
Y, 
Z, 
1 
= 
ZF+1, 
Y, 
X, 
1 
A i, 
1, 
djdo, 
d 2 
-di + A 2 , 
1 , 
-di-d 2 , 
A 2 
d 2 , 
1, 
d]d 2 , 
A l 
A 1 + d 2 , 
1, 
d-l-do, 
A4 
dg, 
1, 
-d.3-d.4i 
d-4 
A 3 + d 4 , 
1, 
d 3 d 4 , 
d-4 
ZF+1, F, Z, 1 
= (d4-d 2 ) 
ZF+1, Z, F 
dj + d 2 , 1, did,, d 2 
dj + d 2 , d. 4 d 2 , 1 
0, 0, o, dj - d 2 
d 3 + d 4 , d 3 A 4 , 1 
d 3 + A 4 , 1, d 3 d 4 , d 4 
therefore 
XY+ 1, 
Ai + d 2 , 
A 3 + d 4 , 
X, 
did 2 , 
d 3 d 4 , 
Ed. [W. J. M.]} 
[Vol. II. pp. 22—24.] 
1513. (Proposed by the Rev. J. Blissard, B.A.)—Prove the following formulas 
(x — 1) (x — 2).. (x — n) 
(1) 
X (x + 1) .. (x + n — 1) 
l+(-\nJ n 1 n(n 2 -P) 1 n(n 2 — l 2 )(n 2 — 2 2 ) 
1+ ' ' > 'x P ' x+l + P. 2 2 'x+2
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.