Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., late sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 8)

[545 
546] 
535 
ch satisfy 
lere is a 
locus is 
each of 
on to be 
recognise 
b of the 
solution, 
5 account 
pectively. 
THEOEEMS IN 
546. 
RELATION TO CERTAIN SIGN-SYMBOLS. 
[From the Messenger of Mathematics, vol. n. (1873), pp. 17—20.] 
I find the following among my papers: 
Let the latin letters a, h,... denote lines of n signs ±, and the greek letters 
a, /3,... columns of the same number n of signs ±; two symbols of the same kind 
are multiplied together by multiplying their corresponding terms, the product being 
thus a symbol of the same kind; in particular, the product of a symbol by itself, or 
square of a symbol, is a line (or column as the case may be) of +’s: and the symbol 
itself is thus a square root of a line (or column) of +’s. Thus n being = 5, we say 
that the latin letters denote roots of + 4- + + + and the greek letters roots of + 
+ 
+ 
+ 
+. 
The roots a, b, c, d, e will be independent if no one of them is equal to the 
product of all or any of the others; and, this being so, the 32 roots are the terms of 
(1 + d) (1 + 6) (1 + c) (1 -f d) (1 + e); 
it follows that, for any other system of independent roots a', b', c', d', e, we have 
(1 + a!) (1 + b') (1 + c') (1 + d') (1 + e) = (1 + a) (1 + b) (1 + c) (1 + d) (1 + e): 
and conversely if either system be independent and this equation is satisfied, then 
the other system is also independent.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.