[487
487]
ON THE QUARTIC SURFACES (*$Z7, V, Wf = 0.
3
; wy=o.
ics, vol. xi. (1871),
Le reciprocals of several
the coordinates (X, Y, Z, W) and (x, y, z, w) is then Xx + Yy + Zz + Ww = 0, and the
equation (X, Y, Z, W) 4 = 0 is the equation in point-coordinates of the quartic surface,
or in line-coordinates of the reciprocal surface : and similarly the equation (x, y, z, w) n = 0
is the equation in point-coordinates of the reciprocal surface, or in line-coordinates of
the quartic surface.
Parabolic ring, or envelope of a sphere of constant radius having its centre on a
parabola.
Taking k for the radius of the sphere, and z = 0, y 2 = 4ax for the equations of
the parabola, then the coordinates of a point on the parabola are ad 2 , 2a6, 0; where
6 is a variable parameter. The equation of the sphere therefore is
(x — a6 2 w) 2 + (y — 2 aduif + z 2 — k 2 w 2 — 0,
and the ring is the envelope of this sphere.
The reciprocal of the sphere is
k 2 (.X 2 +Y 2 + Z 2 ) - (ad 2 X + 2adY+ W) 2 = 0 ;
writing this in the form
ad 2 X + 2a0Y+ W+ k f(X 2 + Y 2 + Z 2 ) = 0,
and taking the envelope in regard to 6, we have
X{W+k V(X 2 + Y 2 + Z 2 )} — aY 2 = 0,
or, what is the same thing,
(aY 2 -X W) 2 - k 2 X 2 (X 2 + Y 2 + Z 2 ) = 0,
soid at right angles to
y detail, but merely for
and with the present
but for thfe metrical
3qual to unity: I have
quations shall be homo-
e without difficulty, and
i change.
a, point on the quartic
are to be considered as
>r the coordinates of a
2. The reciprocation is
): the relation between
for the equation of the quartic surface. This has the line X = 0, Y= 0 for a tacnodal
line, but I am not in possession of a theory enabling me thence to infer that the
parabolic ring is of the order 6.
To show that it is so, I revert to the equation of the variable sphere
(x — ad 2 u>) 2 + (y — 2a6w) 2 + z 2 — k 2 w 2 = 0,
or, what is the same thing,
(A, B, G, D, E\6, 1) 4 = 0,
where
A = Sa 2 w 2 ,
B = 0,
G = a (2aw 2 — xw),
D = — 2ayw,
E— 3 {x 2 -f y 2 + z 2 — k 2 w 2 ).
1—2