Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., late sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 9)

138 
A MEMOIR ON THE TRANSFORMATION OF ELLIPTIC FUNCTIONS. 
[578 
578] 
The Multiplier Equation. Art. No. 29. 
29. The theory is in many respects analogous to that of the modular equation. 
To each value of v there corresponds a single value of M; hence M, or what is the 
prime, the order is = n + 1. The last term of the equation is constant, and the other 
coefficients are rational and integral functions of u s , of a degree not exceeding % (n — 1); 
and not only so, but they are, n = 1 (mod. 4), rational and integral functions of w 8 (l — u s ), 
and n = 3 (mod. 4), alternately of this form and of the same form multiplied by the 
factor (1 — 2ii 8 ). 
The values are in fact given as transcendental functions of q; viz. denoting by 
M 0 , M u M 2 , ..., M n the values corresponding to v 0 , v 1} v 2 , ... , v n respectively, and writing 
, _ (1 + qH1 + 9 3 ) (! + g 5 )-(l - f) (1 - 9 4 ) (1 - fh. 
* W (1 - q) (1 - ? 3 ) (1 - <f) ... (1 + f) (1 + q*) (1 + q*) . 
= 1 -f 2q + 2q 4 4 2q 9 + 2q ls + ..., 
then we have 
Hence, the form of the equation being known, the values of the numerical coefficients 
may be calculated; and it was in this way that Joubert obtained the following results. 
I have in some cases changed the sign of Joubert’s multiplier, so that in every case 
the value corresponding to u = 0 shall be M=l. 
The equations are: 
u = 0, this is 
u — 1, it is 
-3 = 0.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.