Hil [lilf|
IStl
A MEMOIR ON PREPOTENTIALS.
Reverting to the original form of the two equations, and attending to the relation
Q'+ Q" = 0, we obtain
dW' dW" -4(ri) s+1
+ -TT = “tVTTT—T\ p,
or, what is the same thing,
r (**-*)
r (*«-*) fdW'
11. I recall the signification of the symbols:—V', V" are the potentials, it may
be different functions of the coordinates (a, .., c, e) of the attracted point, for positions
of this point on the two sides of the surface (as to this more presently): and W', W"
are what V', V" respectively become when the coordinates (a, .., c, e) are replaced by
(x,..,z, w), the coordinates of a point N on the surface. The explanation of the
dW' dW"
symbols - is given a little above; p denotes the density at the point (x,.., z, w).
12. The like remarks arise as with regard to the former distribution theorem (A);
the functions V', V" cannot be assumed at pleasure; non constat that there is any
distribution in space, and still less any distribution on the surface, which would give
such values to the potential of a point (a, .., c, e) on the two sides of the surface
respectively; but assuming that the functions V', V" are such that they do arise from
a distribution on the surface, or say that they satisfy all the conditions, whatever they
are, required in order that this may be so, then the formula determines the distri
bution, viz. it gives the value of p, the density at a point {x, .., 2, w) of the surface.
13. In the case where the surface is the plane w = 0, viz. in the case of the
potential-plane integral,
pdx... dz
{(« — xf -f-... + (c — z) 2 + e 2 }4 s ~l
(e assumed to be positive); then, since the conformation is symmetrical on the two sides
of the plane, V' and V" are the same functions of (a, .., c, e), say they are each = V;
W', W" are each of them the same function, say they are each = W, of (x, .., z, e)
that V is of (a, .., c, e) ; the distribution-formula becomes
r(*«-*) (dW\
p 2(ri)*«UeA..
viz. this is also what one of the prepotential-plane formulae becomes on writing therein