Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., late sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 9)

565] 
NOTE ON THE CARTESIAN. 
47 
respectively; this being so each of the Cartesians will, it is clear, pass through the 
point P 6 , and therefore also through P a and P c . 
The geometrical relations of the figure give 
to which might be joined 
aR 2 + ß S 2 + yT 2 = — aßy, 
aR' 2 4 ßS' 2 4 7T' 2 = — aßy, 
RT' 4 R'T = — ß(S + S'), 
ya = SS', 
yTT = aRR', 
R' 2 S 4 r (S 4 S') + R 2 S' = SS' (S + S'), 
T' 2 S + a 2 (S 4 S') 4 T 2 S' = SS' (S + S'), 
SR'T = S'RT, 
SP'R' = S'PR, 
but these are not required for the present purpose. 
As regards the first Cartesian, we have to verify that 
(ST + S'T) 2 (:TR' 4 T'R) 2 | (RS' - R'S) 2 _ Q 
a ^ 7 
The left-hand side is 
S 2 T' 2 + S' 2 T 2 + 2yoiTT' /3 2 (S 2 + S' 2 + 2ya) S 2 R' 2 4 S' 2 R 2 - 2yaRR' 
1 1 — 
a /3 y 
viz. this is 
= S> + /3 + ^ S ) + S' ! (~ + /3 + + 2a/3y + 2 (yTT - aRR), 
which is 
= S 2 (^f 2 ) + S' 2 ( Z ^) + 2^7 + 2 (yTT' - aRR'), 
/3 
and since the first and second terms are together = — 2 — S 2 S' 2 , that is, = — 2a/3y, 
ya 
the whole is as it should be = 0. 
In precisely the same manner we have 
(ST' - S'T) 2 (TR' 4- T'R) 2 | {RS' + R'S) 2 = Q 
a /3 7 
which is the condition for the second Cartesian: and the theorem in question is thus 
proved.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.