Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., late sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 10)

358 
A TENTH MEMOIR ON QUANTICS. 
[693 
and we have thus the expression of В (see the Table No. 97) ; and similarly for the 
other capital covariants G, D, .., V, W : in every case the coefficients are obtained 
in the standard form, that is, as rational and integral functions of a, b, c, d, e, f, 
linear as regards f 
378. It will be observed that there is in each case a certain power of a which 
explicitly divides all the coefficients and is consequently written as an exterior factor: 
disregarding these exterior factors, the leading coefficients for B, G, D, E, F are 
h, c, ad, e, f respectively; that for G is 12abd + 46 2 c + e 2 , which must be = g multi 
plied by a power of a, and (in Table 97) is given as = a?g ; similarly, that for H is 
Qacd + 4be 2 + ef, which must be = h multiplied by a power of a, and is given as = аЯь : 
and so in the other cases. The index of a is at once obtained by means of the 
deg-order, which is in each case inserted at the foot of the coefficient. 
For A, B, G, E, F there is no power of a as an interior factor: and for the 
invariants G, Q, U we may imagine the interior factor thrown together with the 
exterior factor, (G = a 6 g, &c.) : whence disregarding the exterior factors, we may say 
that for A, B, G, E, F, G, Q, U the standard forms are also “divided” forms. 
But take any other covariant—for instance, D: the leading coefficient is ad, having 
the interior factor a; and this being so it is found that all the following coefficients 
will divide by a (the quotients being of course expressible only in terms of the 
covariants subsequent to /): thus the second coefficient of D is —bf+ce, and (5.11) 
we have — bf+ce = ai, or the coefficient divided by a is = i; and so for the other 
coefficients of D; or throwing out the factor a, we obtain for D an expression of 
the form (d, i,...\x, y) 3 , see the Table 98: this is the “divided” form of D: and 
we have similarly a divided form for every other capital covariant. All that has 
been required is that each coefficient of the divided form shall be expressed as a 
rational and integral function of the covariants a, b, c, .., v, w : and the form is not 
hereby made definite : to render it so, the coefficient must be expressed in the 
segregate form. But there is frequently the disadvantage that we thus introduce 
fractions ; for instance, the last coefficient of i) is =- ci + df y where to get rid of 
the congregate term df we have (6.12), 3df= — al + 2ci, and the segregate form of 
the coefficient is = — |al + § ci. 
379. We have in regard to the canonical form, a differential operator which is 
analogous to the two differential operators xd y — {xd y }, yd x — [yd^ considered in the 
Introductory Memoir (1854), [139]. Let 8 denote a differentiation in regard to the 
constants under the conditions 
8a = 0, 
8b = e, 
8c = 3f 
U= i(-bf+ce), (= i), 
CL 
8e = — 6ad — 10 be, 
8f = 2a% - 18c 2 ,
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.