Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., late sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 11)

276 
ON THE THEOREM OF THE FINITE NUMBER 
[761 
There are three squares R 1} viz. these are the squares 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
representing the before-mentioned invariants (a — /3) (7 — 8), (a - 7) (¡3 — 8), (a - 8) (¡3 — y) 
respectively: say these are a, b, c, and every other invariant is a rational and 
integral function of these; in fact, the 0-equations give easily 12 = 34, 13 = 24, 14 = 23, 
so that the general form of the invariant is = a 12 b 13 c 14 , where 12, 13, 14 are each 
of them a positive integer number (which may be = 0). Or, what is the same thing, 
the square R e (0=12 + 13 + 14) is a sum 
= 12 . + 13.22/ + 14. R", 
with positive integer coefficients 12, 13, 14, say for shortness it is a sum of squares 
R 1 . And so any like expression with a negative coefficient or coefficients may, for 
shortness, be called a difference of squares R x . 
Observe that, in general, two squares R e , R$ are added together by adding their 
corresponding terms, the result being a square R g+ ^; similarly, if each term of R^ be 
less than or at most equal to the corresponding term of R g , then (but not otherwise) 
the square R$ may be subtracted from R e , giving a square R g -$. 
In the case of the sextic 
(x — ol)(x — /3) (x — y)(x — 8) (x — e)(x — £), 
there are fifteen squares R 1} which may be represented as follows: 
12.34.56 
12.35.46 
12.36.45 
13.24.56 
x 1 
Vi 
z, 
13.25.46 
13.26.45 
14.23.56 
2/2 
^2 
x z 
14.25.36 
14.26.35 
15.23.46 
2/3 
*3 
Xi 
15.24.36 
15.26.34 
16.23.45 
16.24.35 
16.25.34 
2/4 
x 5 
V5 
Z 5 5
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.