Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., late sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 11)

795] 
NUMBERS. 
595 
3. The only numbers divisible by a number JS T = a a b^c y ... are the numbers 
a a '№c y •••> where each exponent a is equal to or greater than the corresponding 
exponent a. And conversely the only numbers which divide A are those of the form 
a a 'Wc y '..., where each index a' is at most equal to the corresponding index a; and 
in particular each or any of the indices a! may be = 0. Again, the least common 
multiple of two numbers A = a a №c y ... and A' = a a '№'c y ' ... is a a "№"c y "..., where each 
index a' is equal to the largest of the corresponding indices a, a ;—observe that any 
one or more of the indices a, /3, y,..., a', /3', y,..., may be = 0, so that the theorem 
extends to the case where either of the numbers A r , A', has prime factors which are 
not factors of the other number. And so the greatest common measure of two 
numbers A — a a №c y ... and A' = a a 'b^'c y '... is a a "Wc y '..., where each index a" is equal 
to the least of the corresponding indices a and a. 
4. The divisors of JST=a a №c y ... are the several terms of the product 
(1 + a + ... + a a ) (1 + b + ... + ¥) (1 + c + ... + c y ), 
where unity and the number N itself are reckoned each of them as a divisor. Hence 
the number of divisors is = (a + 1) (/3 +1) (7 + 1) ..., and the sum of the divisors is 
_ (q«+ 1 - 1) (№ +1 - 1) (c y+1 - 1) ... 
(a-l)(6-l)(c-l)... 
5. In ii= a a №c y ... the number of integers less than N and prime to it is 
To find the numbers in question write down the series of numbers 1, 2, 3,..., N; 
strike out all the numbers divisible by a, then those divisible by b, then those divisible 
by c, and so on; there will remain only the numbers prime to A r . For actually 
finding the numbers we may of course in striking out those divisible by b disregard 
the numbers already struck out as divisible by a, and in striking out with respect to 
c disregard the numbers already struck out as divisible by a or b, and so on; but 
in order to count the remaining numbers it is more convenient to ignore the previous 
strikings out. Suppose, for a moment, there are only two prime factors a and b, then 
the number of terms struck out as divisible by a is = N. —, and the number of 
CL 
terms struck out as divisible by b is = A. ^; but then each term divisible by ab will 
have been twice struck out; the number of these is =N.^r, and thus the number 
u ~ ab’ 
which is = N 
of the remaining terms is Ail 
a b ab. 
treating in like manner the case of three or more prime factors a, b, c,... we arrive at the 
general theorem. The formula gives <£ (1) = 1 viz. when N = 1, there is no factor 1 - i; 
and it is necessary to consider 0(1) as being =1. The explanation is that 0(A) 
75—2
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.