Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., late sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 11)

600 numbeks. [795 
17. Any number x less than p is =g m , and, if m is not prime to p— 1, but 
has with it a greatest common measure e, suppose m = ke, p — 1 = ef, then 
x = g ke , xf = g ke f = g k (v ~ l) = 1, 
that is, x? = 1; and it is easily seen that in the series of powers x, x z , ..., xf, we have 
xf as the first term which is = 1 (mod. p). A number = g m , where to is not prime to 
p — 1, is thus not a prime root; and it further appears that, g being any particular 
prime root, the <£ (p — 1) prime roots are = the numbers g m , where to is any number 
less than p — 1 and prime to it. Thus in the foregoing example p = 7, where the 
prime roots were 3 and 5, the integers less than 6 and prime to it are 1, 5; and 
we, in fact, have 5 = 3 s and 3 = 5 5 (mod. 7). 
18. Integers belonging to a given exponent; index of a number. If, as before, 
p — 1 = ef, that is, if / be a submultiple of p — 1, then any integer x such that xf 
is the lowest power of x which is = 1 (mod. p) is said to belong to the exponent f 
The number of residues, or terms of the series 1, 2, 3, .... p — 1, which belong to the 
exponent / is </> (/), the number of integers less than f and prime to it; these are 
the roots of the congruence [ccf —1] = 0 of the order </>(/). It is hardly necessary to 
remark that the prime roots belong to the exponent p — 1. 
A number x = g m is said to have the index to; observe the distinction between 
the two terms exponent and index; and, further, that the index is dependent on the 
selected prime root g. 
19. Special forms of composite modulus. If instead of a prime modulus p we 
have a modulus p m which is the power of an odd prime, or a modulus 2p or 2p m 
which is twice an odd prime or a power of an odd prime, then there is a theory 
analogous to that of prime roots, viz. the numbers less than the modulus and prime 
to it are congruent to successive powers of a prime root g\ thus, 
if p m = 3 2 , we have 
2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64 = 2, 4, 8, 7, 5, 1 (mod. 9), 
and if 2p m = 2.3 2 , we have 
5, 25, 125, 625, 3125, 15625 = 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 1 (mod. 18). 
As regards the even prime 2 and its powers—for the modulus 2 or 4 the theory of 
prime roots does not come into existence, and for the higher powers it is not 
applicable; thus with modulus = 8 the numbers less than 8 and prime to it are 
1, 3, 5, 7 ; and we have 3 2 = 5 2 = 7 2 = 1 (mod. 8). 
20. Composite modulus N— a a №c y ...—no prime roots—irregularity. In the general 
case of a composite modulus it has been seen that, if x is any number less than N 
and prime to it, then — 1 = 0 (mod. A r ). But, except in the above-mentioned cases 
p m , 2p m , 2 or 4, there is not any number a such that a* 6*0 is the first power of a 
which is = 1; there is always some submultiple i = ^ <f> (N) such that a 1 is the first
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.