Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., late sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 12)

420 solution of (a, b, c, d)=(a 2 , b 2 , c\ d 2 ). [855 
and it hence appears that, writing 7, e, 6 to denote respectively an imaginary cube 
root, fifth root, and seventh root of unity, then the values of (a, b, c, d) are 
1, 
1 , 
1, 
i ; 
7> 
7- 
7 2 > 
7 2 ; 
1, 
1, 
7> 
7 2 ; 
e, 
e 2 , 
e 3 , 
e 4 ; 
67, 
e y, 
e 4 7 , 
e 3 7 2 ; 
e 2 7, 
e 4 7 2 , 
e 3 7 , 
e 7 2 ; 
1, 
e, 
e\ 
1, 
0 3 , 
6\ 
0 5 ‘, 
viz. for each of these systems we have the required relation 
(a, b, c, d) = (a 2 , b 2 , c 2 , d 2 ). 
It may be noticed that out of the eight equations we have the following three 
which are irreducible :— 
x 4 + a? + x 2 + x + 1 =0, 
x A + £(— 1 + i V15) x 3 — 2x 2 + -|(— 1 — i \J15)x + 1=0, 
ic 4 + ^ (— 1 — i V15) x? — 2x 2 + ^ (— 1 + i \Z15)ic+ 1 = 0. 
Each of these is an Abelian equation, viz. the roots are of the form 
a, 6 (a), 6 2 (a), 6 s (a), (= a, a 2 , a 4 , a 8 ), 
where 6 4 (a) = a, not identically but in virtue of the value of a, viz. we have 0 4 (a) = a 16 = a, 
in virtue of a 15 =l: (in the first equation a 5 = 1, and therefore a 15 =l; in each of 
the other two, a 15 is the lowest power which is =1). 
In the first equation, we have evidently 
as the irreducible factor of x 5 — 1. 
The second and third equations combined together give 
(x 4 — \x 3 — 2x 2 — \x + l) 2 + -Ui {a? — x) 2 = 0 ; 
that is, 
&' 8 — od + x 5 — x 4 + x 3 — x + 1 = 0, 
where the left-hand side is the irreducible factor of x 15 — 1.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.