Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., late sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 12)

[806 
lO 
XtH 
1—1 
o 
00 
807. 
tion of the 
A PROOF OF WILSON’S THEOREM. 
= 0, 
[From the Messenger of Mathematics, vol. xii. (1883), p. 41.] 
Let n be a prime number; and imagine n points, the vertices of a regular 
polygon; any polygon which can be formed with these n points as vertices is either 
0...(2), 
regular or else it is one of a set of n equal and similar polygons. For instance, 
n — 5, the polygon as shown in the figure is one of a set of 5 equal and similar 
>, c, f, g, h) 
3 
(3). 
2 </ 
aates (a,...) 
X \/ .4 
(4), 
(5), 
/ 
(6), 
1 5 
b, c, f, g, h. 
p.q.r = 2pqr 
efficients of 
f the other 
y, z), and 
i) is 
polygons; in fact, if the points taken in their cyclical order, but beginning at pleasure 
with any one of the 5 points are called 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, then we have 5 such polygons 
13254; and so in general. The whole number of polygons is ^ . 1.2.3 ... (n — 1); and 
the number of the regular polygons is \{n— 1); hence the number of the remaining 
polygons is = \ (n — 1) {1 • 2 ... (n — 2) — 1}; and this number must therefore be divisible 
by n; that is, 1.2 ... (n — 1) — n +1 is divisible by n; or, what is the same thing, 
1.2... (n — 1) + 1 is divisible by n, which is the theorem in question. 
us is = 4n ;
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.