Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., late sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 13)

96 
ON THE PARTITIONS OF A POLYGON. 
[915 
which I prove as follows. Writing U to denote the same function of u which X is 
of x, I start from the equation 
u = x + yU, 
which determines m as a function of the independent variables x, y. We have 
|a-,v)=v d £ ( i 
where the accent denotes differentiation in regard to u; hence 
or say 
Writing 
and therefore 
this equation may be written 
du _ jj du _u — x du 
dy dx y dx’ 
du .du 
y T y ={ ~ u - x) di- 
/ x =\udx, 
du 1 
Jx~ U ’ 
d 2 u x du x du 
y — =u 
du 
dxdy dx " dx U X dx ’ 
or, integrating with respect to x, we have 
or say 
that is, 
du x j 
y — u x = \u 2 — ux, 
2 du x 2 (u x — ^x 2 ) _(u — xf 
y dy 
r 
y 
2 d (u x — _(u — ocf 
dy V y )~ y 2 
6. But, from the equation 
we have 
u = x + yU, 
r , y 6 
u =x + yX + ^2( ZS )'+ 1>2> 3 
and thence 
% = K+ A. + o + iXa ( x ’)' + 
if for a moment X x is written for jxdx. And hence, from the relation obtained 
above, we have the required identity 
4y 
6y 
Î72 + T±3 + nfo + •— H+ifi < x> >' + ÏTO ( x ’r +
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.