Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., late sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 13)

915] 
ON THE PARTITIONS OF A POLYGON. 
101 
13. The reasoning is perfectly general; and applying it successively to the 
partitions into two parts, three parts, &c., we have 
V 3 =U 3 , 
V 3 = 2U 1 U 2 , 
V 4 = 2U 1 U 3 + TJ£, 
V 5 = 2U 1 U i + 2U 2 U 3 , 
where any function V is related to the corresponding function TJ as above. The 
value of U-y is obviously 
U 1 = x 3 + a? + x 5 + ... = 
1 — x 
and hence the several functions U and V have the values above written down; the 
general term of TJk is 
[r + k — 2] fc_1 [r — 3p -1 
[&p -1 [A; — l]* -1 
x r ; 
and the number of partitions of the r-gon into k parts is equal to the coefficient 
of x r in this general term. 
14. In the investigations which next follow, I consider, without using the method 
of generating functions, the problem of the j>artition of the r-gon into 2, 3, 4 or 5 
parts; it will be convenient to state the results as follows: 
Number of Partitions. 
2 parts, ~ A, 
Zi 
r 
3 parts, ^ 2A, 
4 parts, ^ (3^4 + 2B), 
5 parts, 3 (4A -f 8B + 2C); 
O 
where the capital letters refer to different “ diagonal-types,” thus: 
2 parts, 3 parts, 4 parts, 
or 1 diagonal: or 2 diagonals: or 3 diagonals: 5 parts, or 4 diagonals: 
A A A B A B C 
viz. if, in a polygon divided into k parts by means of k — 1 diagonals, we delete 
all the sides of the polygon, leaving only the diagonals, then these will present them 
selves under distinct forms, which are what I call “ diagonal-types ”; for instance, when 
k = 4, 
there are the two types A and B shown in the above diagram for four parts.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.