Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., late sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 13)

923] 
NOTE ON A HYPERDETERMINANT IDENTITY. 
211 
course it remains =0 when, consequently upon the foregoing change (x u y^, (x 2 , y 2 ), 
(x 3 , y 3 ) each into (x, y), we also change (f, Vl ), (&, % ), (f„ Va ) each into (£ v ); 
and if we also change (a? 4 , 3/4), &c., into (x, y). 
It is clear that O may denote the covariant symbol 
il = 23“ 31^ 12? 14 s 24 e 34^... U 1 V 2 W z T i ..., 
where U, V, W, T, ... denote qualities 
(a, ...\x, yf\ (a', y) n , ... 
of the degrees m, n, p, q, ... respectively, and U lt V 2 , &c., are the corresponding 
functions (a, ..ffx u y 1 ) m , (a', y 2 ) n , &c., the values of A, B, C being here 
A =m — ¡3 — y — S — ..., 
B — n — y — a — € — , 
G =p -a — /3 - £ - ...; 
the theorem expresses the property that the covariants 120, 230, 310, are linearly 
connected together ; or, writing it in the form (A 12 — C13 + B 23) 0 = 0, we have the 
proper linear combination A 120 - C130 of the two covariants 120 and 130, equal to 
— B 230, a determinate multiple of 230. Speaking roughly, we say that the difference 
of the covariants 120 and 130 is equal to 230. 
27—2
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.