Full text: The collected mathematical papers of Arthur Cayley, Sc.D., F.R.S., late sadlerian professor of pure mathematics in the University of Cambridge (Vol. 13)

336 
[934 
934. 
NOTE ON THE SO-CALLED QUOTIENT U/iY IN THE THEORY 
OF GROUPS. 
[From the American Journal of Mathematics, t. xv. (1893), pp. 387, 388.] 
The notion (see Holder, “ Zur Reduction der algebraischen Gleichungen,” Math. 
Ann., t. xxxiv. (1887), § 4, p. 31) is a very important one, and it is extensively 
made use of in Mr Young’s paper, “On the Determination of Groups whose Order 
is the Power of a Prime,” American Journal of Mathematics, t. xv. (1893), pp. 124— 
178; but it seems to me that the meaning is explained with hardly sufficient 
clearness, and that a more suitable algorithm might be adopted, viz. instead of 
G 1 —G/T 1 , I would rather write G = Tj. QG 1 or QG 1 .Y 1 . 
We are concerned with a group G containing as part of itself a group r t , such 
that each element of r x is commutative with each element of G. This being so, we 
may write 
G = QG 1 .T 1 , 
where QG 1 is not a group but a mere array of elements, viz. if r x = (l, A 2 , ..., A s ), 
and QGi = (l, B 2 , ..., B t ), then the formula is 
G = { 1, B 2 , ..., B t )( 1, A 2 , ..., As), 
where it is to be noticed that the elements B are not determinate; in fact, if A 0 
be any element of r x , we may, in place of an element B, write BA e , for 
B( 1, A 2 , ..., M s ) and BA e ( 1, A 2 , ..., M s ) 
are, in different orders, the same elements of G. 
But, G being a group, the product of any two elements of G is an element of 
G ; viz. we thus have in general 
B{ A. BjAf = B k A k ',
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.