FOUR-DIMENSIONAL TUBES
157
xi. 4]
Whittaker then proceeds to show that a surface, E, can be
found which is at every one of its points, half-orthogonal to the
electropotential surface which passes through the point, and is also
half-orthogonal to the magnetopotential surface which passes
through the point. It may be remarked that the property here
called “ half-orthogonality ” is really the same as what in ordinary
three-dimensional geometry is simply called the “ perpendicu
larity ” of two planes.
When the field is purely electrostatic, or purely magnetostatic,
the surfaces E become the ordinary Faraday tubes of force.
In the general case the surfaces are a covariant family of surfaces,
which may be called the tubes of force of the electromagnetic
field or calamoids (from KaXafiog, a reed-pipe). Thus the Faraday
electric and magnetic tubes are not distinct and rival things, but
two limiting cases of the same thing.
It can be shown that these four-dimensional tubes of force
possess important properties analogous to those belonging to
ordinary Faraday tubes. In electrostatics there is a well-known
result, which states that “ the cross-section of a Faraday tube,
multiplied by the value of the electric force, is constant along the
whole length of the tube.” The corresponding theorem in the
four-dimensional world asserts that the cross-section of a thin
calamoid (measured by the area which it cuts off on the electro
potential surfaces which intersect it in curves) multiplied by the
value of \/(D 2 — H 2 ) is constant along the whole length of the
calamoid. Here D represents the electric vector, and H the
magnetic vector at a point. The quantity
\/{(Electric Force) 2 — (Magnetic Force) 2 }
is well known to be covariant with respect to all Lorentz trans
formations. The calamoids are also covariant—which implies
that they are the same, whatever be the. observer whose measures
of electric and magnetic force are used in constructing them.
It is not very easy to get a clear mental picture of the cala
moids, especially in their most general form. Milner * has
treated the question in a somewhat different way with the
intention of extending Whittaker’s results and enabling the
reader to construct a representation of electromagnetic lines in
hyperspace. In the electromagnetic field the directions of the
electric and magnetic forces are in general neither along the same
line nor at right angles to each other. Observers in different
hyperplanes will form different conceptions of the strengths and
directions of the electric and magnetic forces. Milner shows,
however, that when viewed in a suitable hyperplane, i.e., when
suitably transformed, the electric and magnetic forces at any
* S. R. Milner, Phil. Mag., vol. 44, p. 705, 1922.