and there is a so-called false mimicry, in which no useful
end is answered, by the resemblance which one species
bears to another. In the first place, it happens sometimes
that two unprotected species mimic one another.
“ In tropical Africa we find two unrelated groups of butterflies,
belonging to two very distinct families (Nymphalidse and Papilionidse)
characterised by a prevailing blue-green colour not found in any
other continent. Again we have a group of African Pieridae,
and in the same country one of the Lycaenidie (.Lefttcna eras/us) is
coloured so exactly like these that it was at first described as a species of
Pieris. None of these four groups are known to be in any way
specially protected, so that the resemblance cannot be due to pro
tective mimicry.”—(Wallace. Tropical Nature, pp. 235-6.)
“ In another series of genera (Catagramma, Callitliea, and Agrias),
all belonging to the Nymphalidm, we have the most vivid blue ground,
with broad bands of orange, crimson, or a different tint of blue or
purple exactly reproduced in corresponding, yet unrelated, species,
occurring in the same locality ; yet, as none of these groups are
known to be specially protected, this can hardly be true mimicry.”
“A few species of two other genera in the same country (Eunica
and Siderone) also reproduce the same colours, but with only a
general resemblance in the markings. Yet again, in tropical
America, we have species of Apatura which, sometimes in both
sexes, sometimes in the female only, exactly imitate the peculiar
markings of another genus (Heterochroa) confined to America.
Here, again, neither genus is protected, and the similarity must be
due to unknown local causes.”—(Ibid. p. 257.)
In the second place, there are cases in which two pro
tected species mimic one another.
•“ In South America, in the three sub-families Danainae, Acraeina?,
and Heliconiinae, all of which are specially protected, we find
identical tints and patterns reproduced, often in the greatest detail,
each peculiar type of coloration being characteristic of separate geo
graphical sub-divisions of the continent. . . . Other changes of a like
nature . . . occur in species of the same groups inhabiting these
same localities, as well as Central America and the Antilles. The re
semblance thus produced between widely different insects is some
times general, but often so close and minute, that only a critical
examination of structure can detect the difference between them.