52
Radial Distortion Effects
of Compensating Glass Plates
in Projection Prirjter Wild U3A
h = 0 m
Compensation = 0
Diapositiv.e nr1 x
nr 2 o
The curve measured at the Division of PhotogrammetryOhegnd method)
— attheGeographical Survey Office
dr' pm
10 ■
10
=*-s-
*
I--»
150 r’mm
Standard errors of unit weight (the grid method)
X S.'s 22 1.9 16 26 21 2.1 11 30 3.4 3 5 38 33 4.4 4.7 4.2 6.0 microns
o S.'=22 19 16 19 2.1 29 35 4.4 3.8 4.2 4.0 5! 4.5 45 4.3 4.1
Fig. 2.4:4
Radial Distortion Effects
of Compensating Glass Plates
in Projection Printer Wild U3A
h = 1500 m
Diapositive nr 3 x
"— nr 4 o
The curve measured at the Division of Photogrammetrydhe grid method)
— “ " at the Geographical Survey Office
The nominal curve of the —"—
The radial distortion effects of photographs according to
operative tests (average of 5 cameras theOland test field)
O S.'s 08 16 27 20 1.1 2.6 20 26 30 28 28 3437 51 4.0 4,7 —
Fig. 2.4:5
Radial Distortion Effects
of Compensating Glass Plates
in Projection Printer Wild U3A
h = 3000 m
Diapositive nr 5 *
nr 6 °
The curve measured at the Division of Fhotogrammetry (the grid mctbod)
" " at the Geographical Survey Office
The nominal curve of the —*— —
The radial distortion effects of photographs according to
operative tests (average of 5 cameras, the Oland test field)
dr'pm
Standard errors of unit weight (the grid method)
X S.'s 16 22 2.1 23 1.8 19 33 28 28 3.5 33 36 36 5.1 51 5.9 microns
o S.’s 10 1.1 19 19 23 28 31 3.0 22 2.6 3.2 29 38 3.6 32 5.6 —
Fig. 2.4:6