Full text: Commissions III (Part 5)

144 
3 - Graphical representation of the errors 
In order to provide complete comprehension of the results of each test, besides 
the list of differences of the control points coordinates, we have represented 
graphically the distribution of these differences on the points of the polygon. These 
representations are contained in figures from 1 to 29. 
The errors in X and Y, or planimetric errors, have been represented by means 
of a vector oriented with the origin in the position of the corresponding point on the 
planimetry of the polygon, whose length is given by 
K V(KJ + (A/ 
where K is the scale of representation of the vectors. 
The opportunity, simplicity and evidence of such a representation are remark 
able. The total planimetric behaviour of the errors on the polygon is very clear. 
The choice of the principle for the representation of the errors in height of the 
control points in the different tests was not so easy. At first, the Secretary of the 
Group proposed to indicate next to the point, on the planimetry of the polygon, the 
numerical value of the error and to draw, between the points, the curves of equal 
error. 
However, this plan did not appear convenient, even though quite helpful for 
purposes of interpretation. 
As the I.G.N. of Paris suggested, we preferred to represent the errors in height 
by means of vectors, starting from the planimetric position of the point, oriented to 
the top or the bottom of the page according to the sign of the error and with length 
proportional to the magnitude of the error itself. 
The drawing of these graphs was assigned to the respective centres. In order to 
make the representation uniform, a unique principle was chosen as a basis for data 
rejection. We established that points with an error in the coordinates higher than 
60 m should be removed from the graph concerning each test; moreover, a group of 
14 points was suppressed because they were evidently anomalous for non photogram- 
metric reasons. These are the points: 11, 12, 26, 83, 99, 174, 199, 209, 236, 249, 270, 
282, 294, 300. 
In part C of this chapter, where we deal with the statistical research on the 
anomalous points, we shall justify this removal. 
An important element for the interpretation of results is the number and the 
position of the control points used for the planimetric and altimetric adjustment of the 
blocks. These points are marked by a triangle on the graphic representation of the 
errors. 
In addition the points that have not been plotted or with an error in the coor 
dinates higher than 60 m, have been removed from the graphs of each test, thereby 
eliminating confusion between these points and the ones with error equal to 0. 
4 - STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE ERRORS 
Even if not absolutely necessary, we thought it useful to add to the complete 
list of the differences and to their graphic representation, a synthetic grouping, sim 
plifying and helping eventual comparisons among the different results. Table 2 
represents, in fact, the residual errors on the coordinates of the different tests, grouped 
in classes of frequencies of variable amplitude.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.