POINTING ERROR (Sec. 
TARGET VISUAL ANGLE (Min.) 
Figure 2. Visually-fitted curves showing the identical relationships for different measuring mark sizes 
25 - 
20 
15 
10 
-FOVEAL IMAGERY OF SHAR 
? HIGH CONTR 
* 
AST .. _ 
* 
* 
CIRCULAR TARGETS AGAINST EXTENSIVE 
H 
4? 
HOMOGENEOUS BLACK BACKGROUNDS, WIT 
MEASURING MARKS OF DIFFERENT DIAMETERS. 
* 
* 
- ■ -5) 
* 
+ 
(C *5|C’ 
* 
«*• 
* 
* 
ф 
* 
■ 
□ 
□ 
о 
• 
о 
□ ^— 
^ • 
1 
□ 
• 
LEGEND 
$ □ 
n SO 
series, mark 2'.23. 
series, mark 3'.42. 
series, mark 17'.75. 
series, mark 3'.42. 
ereocomparator series. 
Job. 
I 
Чп 
• 
■ 
о 50 
■ 50 
• 10 
* St 
6 8 
ANNULUS WIDTH (Min.) 
10 
12 
14 
Figure 3. The form of the proposed relationship between pointing error and annulus 
width, visually fitted. The standard deviations of the points appear in the appendix,