Full text: Actes du onzième Congrès International de Photogrammétrie (fascicule 4)

    
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
   
  
  
   
  
  
   
  
   
   
    
o 
* 
It is not certain that all partial errors could be observed or studied separately. It will however always be possible 
to study some partial errors and groups of them, Errors could be dependent on each other. In some cases a series 
of partial errors are dependent on each other in a certain order. We mention diapositive, stereoinstrument, rela- 
tive orientation, point identification and operator. The partial errors will in this case add up in a definite order. 
It will hardly be possible to study one of them and notat the same time the others, especially if you wish to find 
out their relative importance upon the total error. The analysis of variance, especially the type with hierarchal 
classification, could be a useful tool for such a study. It will also give the "experimental error” which could be 
considered comparable with the "noise" of radio or television. This experimental error is usually a mixture of 
the residual errors, of all the sources of error. It will hardly be possible to subdivide this noise and to relate its 
parts to special sources of error. That is one of the reasors why we do not believe in the usefulness of the study of 
partial errors. Hence we will study the total photogrammetric error. 
We will not use the mean of the residual y-parallax of an orientated model as an indicator of photogrammetric 
accuracy, because of the following reasons. The y-parallax is a coordinate difference within the model. Con- 
sequently it will hardly indicate'the constant and systematic errors of the y -coordinates of the model nor oí the 
x- and z-coordinates, It is not probable that a one-dimensional y-difference will indicate the error within the 
orthogonal three -dimensional coordinate system of photogrammetry. The y parallax can only give information 
of some of the error sources in photogrammetry. 
In the Reichenbach Experiment 1962-1964 it was stated, that the differences between geodetic and photogrammetric 
xyz coordinates were independent of each other. Large x differences consequently did not indicate large z-errors. 
In the Experiment Reichenbach 1962-1964 as well in the Experiment Pecny” 1966 -1968, large errors have been 
excluded. 
1, PROBLEM 
The following problems should be studied. 
The errorof a comparison point, for the stereomodels 1 and 2 for the three negative scales 1:3 500, 1:6 000 and 
1:12 000, 
The error of distance between two series of every fifth pair of all combinations of points for the first model for all 
three negative scales. 
The frequency and cumulative three -dimensional error distributions of the first models for the three negative sca- 
les. 
The general photogrammetric x distribution of the three -dimensional error distribution.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.