Full text: Actes du onzième Congrès International de Photogrammétrie (fascicule 4)

Ordinarily, all measurements of elevation and of horizontal 
position for specifically designated points, such as spot elevations 
and profile and cross sections, should comply with the requirements in 
Table 3. 
TABIE 3 
  
ACCURACY OF RANDOMLY MEASURED SPOT ELEVATIONS, AND OF PROFILES 
AND CROSS SECTIONS MEASURED PHOTOGRAMMETRICALLY FOR HIGHWAY DESIGN 
AND FOR COMPUTING CONSTRUCTION PAY QUANTITIES 
  
Error as Fraction of Flight Height 
  
Average Root | For 90% of 
(Arithmetic| Mean |Measurements, 
Use and Condition Mean) Square|Not Exceeding 
  
Pay quantities, 
open &ground, 
uniform slopes 1:18,000 |1:6,000 1:3,600 
  
Pay quantities, 
open ground, 
irregular slopes 1:15,000 11:5,000 1:3,000 
  
Preliminary quantities, 
open ground, 
gentle slopes 1:12,000 |1:4,000 1:2, 400 
  
  
Preliminary quantities, 
interferring ground 
cover, rolling to 
rugged slopes 1:9,000 1:3,000 1:1,800 1:900 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Photogrammetric Determination of Supplemental Control--For all 
preliminary surveying in the highway field, photogrammetric methods of 
determining supplemental control have proven to be adequate. This is 
so whether or not the control is determined by analog methods or by 
analytical triangulation using aerial photographs of adequate scale. 
The analytical triangulation, of course, has become feasible with the 
development of precision comparators, availability of point marking and 
transfer instruments, and the use of electronic computers. In a 
practical sense, it is possible to achieve accuracies which are ade- 
quate for photogrammetric compilation of topographic maps, making 
profile and cross section measurements, random and coordinate grid spot 
elevation measurements, and X, Y, and Z measurements of points on 
property boundaries. The acceptable error tolerances for photogram- 
metric analog bridging can be expressed as a fraction of the photog- 
raphy scale. Such has been done in writing specifications which admit 
the use of analog bridging methods. The subsequent tabulation, Table 4, 
titled "Error Tolerances for Analog Bridging" summarizes the tolerances 
acceptable when error is expressed (1) as a fraction of the photography 
scale in feet per inch, and (2) as a fraction of the denominator of the 
representative fraction expressing photography scale. 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.