The relative positions of the. fiducial marks of the camera
The determination of the shrinkage of both negative and diapositive material
requires knowledge of the relative positions of the fiducial marks of the
camera. This is also a condition for the use of analytical block triangulation
in the actual experiment. For the purpose a record of the measurement results
of the fiducial marks of the camera was obtained from Czechoslovakia.
It is evident from the record that each of the four fiducial marks have been
measured three times and the measurements have been repeated 10 days later.
On examination of the measurements of the fiducial marks the fact that the ©“ *
differences between the measurements are in several cases up to 10 microns.
This discrepancy is larger than average.
The position of the cross-shaped fiducial marks of the Wild instrument can be
determined by measuring one point from each segment of line and by calculating
the equations of the lines that pass through the two pairs of opposite points
and by then computing the intersection point of the twp lines. If a precision
stereocomparator is used in the measurement, the coordinates of the fiducial
marks can be determined within an accuracy of +5 microns. In the tests that
are described below the measurements that were taken in Finland were in the
manner described above.
Comparison of the distances between the fiducial marks as determined from the € ©
measurement that took place at a time interval of 10 days indicate that one
pair of opposite fiducial marks has remained unaltered while the other pair
has contracted ca 10 microns. Taking into account the accuracy of measurement
this may be due to chance but it is more likely that the fiducial marks have
been photographed onto film and an affine deformation has taken place during
the 10 days. If the fiducdal ‘marks of the camera have been photographed onto
glass it is difficult to perceive why the latter measurements have on the
whole taken place. Presuming that the photographed was onto film the first
measurement corresponds more accurately wiht the fiducial marks of the camera.
For this reason the first set of measurements have in all following circum-
stances been used as indicative of the relative position of the fiducial marks
of the camera (table 1).