Automation in
Photogrammetric Compilation
W. E. CHAPELLE An automatic system which can fully replace the operator of a photogrammetric
A. E. WHITESIDE compilation instrument has not yet been developed, a fact which is perhaps not
JE BYBEE surprising in view of the wide range of mechanical and intellectual skills required in
manual compilation. However, systems which automate the more routine operator
tasks of stereoperception and plotting have been successfully applied to a number of
instruments. This paper discusses the use of electronic scanning and correlation tech-
niques for the basic terrain-sensing function required in automatic stereoperception. It
also shows how the information sensed by the correlation equipment can be used by
the stored-program digital computer of an analytical stereoplotter to automatically
plot contour and profile manuscripts. The final sections discuss potential approaches
for improving the automatic stereoperception equipment and expanding the role of
the computer to improve system performance and further increase the degree of
automation.
INTRODUCTION
In most stereocompilation instruments, a human
operator is an integral part of the operational process.
In analytical instruments, such as the AS-11A and
AP-C stereoplotters, the operator's task has been
simplified in various ways, for example, by automat-
ing the computational aspects of stereomodel setup
and output scaling. In these instruments, however, as
in the simplest projection-principle plotters, all on-
line measurement and control functions are per-
formed by the operator.
The universal requirement for increased produc-
tivity in stereocompilation has prompted develop-
ment of automatic equipment to provide greater
compilation speed and to eliminate quality-control
problems associated with operator fatigue. The de-
velopment of effective automatic equipment has
proved to be a formidable task, primarily because of
the highly complex and diversified nature of the func-
tions performed by the instrument operator.
For subsequent discussion, it is useful to separate
the operator's functions into four general areas:
(1) Stereoperception and Measurement
The operator views the optical model
created by the instrument and manually ad-
The discussion of automation techniques presented in this paper is
based primarily on the automated analytical stereoplotters developed
by Bendix Research Laboratories under the sponsorship of Rome Air
Development Center, U. S. Air Force.
BENDIX TECHNICAL JOURNAL SUMMER 1968
justs a reference mark to establish or maintain
contact with the apparent terrain surface. This
process is basic to all stereomensuration in-
struments.
(2) Plotting Motion Generation
In manual compilation, the operator intro-
duces the model-coordinate motions required
to trace out lines of interest, simultaneously,
of course, maintaining the reference mark in
contact with the terrain surface.
(3) Photointerpretation
In many situations, the operator must ex-
amine the imagery to recognize certain terrain
features in addition to measuring or plotting
their positions. As examples, the operator per-
forms photointerpretation functions in tracing
out planimetric features and in compensating
hypsographic plots for the heights of trees and
other obstacles.
(4) Overall Control
In the typical stereocompilation process,
the operator must make a series of operator
decisions and judgments concerning planning,
sequencing of operations, and editing.
Thus, manual operation of a stereocompilation instru-
ment requires application of a wide range of human
skills, both mechanical and intellectual. It can be ex-
pected, then, that an automatic system which re-