15
obtained are still available and will be given
hereunder:
A picture scale of 1:30000 was prescribed for
the individual projects which had an average
coverage of 20 000 km 2 . With the use of the
Zeiss-Aerotopograph camera RMK 20/3030
this is equivalent to a flying height of 6000 m
above the ground. The direction of the lines
of flight was uniformly due West-East or
East-West. The average length of the runs
was 140 km, although there were maximum
runs of 320 km. With a strip coverage of
9 km, a flight line spacing of 6,5 km and an
average of 6 runs per mission, the average
area covered was 5000 km 2 . In several cases
where weather conditions were particularly
favorable, up to 10 000 km 2 have been photo
graphed on one mission. With a time of flight
of about 8 hours including travel to and from
the area to be photographed, this corresponds
to a flight path of approximately 2500 km.
The phocographic plane was a two-engine
Heinkel aircraft He 111 which had been
equipped with additional tanks for long-di
stance flights. With an absolute ceiling of
8500 m with full load the aircraft climbed to
about 6000 m in 45 minutes. Air speed at this
level was 320—340 km p.h. For navigation pur
poses, the pilot’s cockpit which afforded amp
le visibility to all sides, was equipped with a
Lotfe. Fligth paths and turns were flown
with a Siemens automatic pilot. The camera
was mounted in the middle of the fuselage
above the entrance “blister“. The latter was
provided with a hatch and could be opened
during the flight. When the camera was
lowered, the automatic Zeiss-Aerotopograph
tilting mount permitted taking picture strips
from horizon to horizon, if required. When
the blister was open, a Plexiglass windbreaker
apron attached to the camera and the magazine
prevented the penetration of the outside air
into the interior of the cabin.
Navigation was based on maps with a scale
of 1 : 2 000 000 in Mercator’s projection with
isogones at 1-degree intervals. Occasionally,
very poor maps at a scale of 1 : 300 000 (pro
bably enlargements of maps 1 : 1 000 000)
were available, which, however, were unsa
tisfactory for pilotage. The 90 strips under
consideration had the following deviations
from the theoretical position:
Maintenance of the geographial East-West-
direction +.
Accuracy of the flight line spacings with in
strument-controlled turns 4^ 120 m
Accuracy of the maintenance of flight line
spacings along the flight paths (140—320 km)
+ 400 m
Control of altitude on missions flown on dif
ferent days (use of FuG 103, geodetic con
trol by comparative ground surveys)
+ 15 m
Fig. 12
Results obtained on two missions of 6 turns each; area covered’, abt. 14000 km-, maximum
lenghts of strips 270 km; 797 photographs. (Only the nadir point of every fifth photograph
is marked)
■■