ing
ose
be
ach
ion
eto
air
ht-
11
ced
1ed
red
rill
tt-
ng
on
1C=
on
latter omit the location of control points for each picture and resort to the direct
determination of the ratio settings for the rectifier. An older process of this nature
which has given satisfactory results in photogrammetric practice (hereinafter
referred to as the ‘adjustment process’) is the Finnish ‘statoscopic horizon-record
process’;
4 more recent one is the ‘displacement method’ developed in the United
States. The latter is based directly on the results of a mechanical radial triangu-
lation.
These considerations permit to evolve the requ
irements to be met by a rectifier
which will allow both high-precision rectification according to the point process
as well as the rapid and efficient application of an adjustment process. In order to
0
AN
PA >
cep
E
= A)
Fig. 8. Diagram of Rectifier SEG V. Cam inverter
3 for Newton’s equation; spatial rod
inverter after Carpentier for fulfilment of
Scheimpflug principle; automatic vanishing
point control by computing gear 9. Illumi-
nation by 2 Fresnel lenses.
latter requiremen
the height could be reduced proportional
the rectifying lens, the effective picture an
ceeded. As regards the necessary intensity of
(or copy-board) in visible light,
higher than those of the adjustment process,
image points and the control points is an essentia
-———
reduce to a minimum the unpro-
ductive time required for syste-
matic trials according to the
point process the number of
possible adjustments will have
to be limited by a mechanical
vanishing point control. An es-
sential engineering feature to be
taken into consideration is that
the application of the adjust-
ment processes obviously enlar-
ges the scope of the rectifier
from that of a simple project-
ion unit to that of a plotting
instrument. The structural ele-
ments must fulfil a number of
geometric requirements in re-
producible manner. As far as
optical and illuminating pro-
blems are concerned, it must be
taken into consideration that
the improved image quality of
modern survey lenses permits to
take aerial photographs on
scales smaller than those used
previously. Every effort should
therefore be made to increase
the power of definition of the
rectifier lens and to enlarge the
range of magnification. The
t is limited by the structural height of the instrument. Although
to a reduction of the focal length of
gle of the objective would soon be ex-
illumination on the projection table
the requirements of the point process are much
for the coincidence of projected
| condition. The main problem
13