duction
sociated
e, This
in the
photo
project-
he
chnique,
ther
ering
que.
ous lim-
atios,
e ini-
that
h per-
ures,
ge
ocusing
ations
ojection
oject-
ictions
n. in
pro-
a —
semi -
in
some
31
There is much less experience so far with the
optical image transfer. The designers of these systems
claim the following main advantages.
"flexibility in choosing a large range of. scales.
- working in illuminated rooms.
- comfortable viewing and profiling operations
- higher. accuracy in profiling
- adaptability to existing plotters
= production of color or. black-white orthophotos
- ease. in production of orthophotos or stereo-
orthophotos in a single production step.
A certain disadvantage is the necessity of intro-
ducing image corrections due to the tili .and tip of the
original photographs. This necessity does not exist in
direct projection type of instruments since the record-
ing of the image elements takes place in the model space.
As to the image quality, I do not have comparative
data. However, there are no reasons to assume difficulties
(when using an optical image transfer system) in achiev-
ing a quality comparable to that of viewing systems in var-
ious,plotters. ..In addition one can claim a uniform quality
disregarding the elevation range in the stereo-model,
which is not the case if direct projection instruments
without auxiliary focusing devices are used. In large
scale work in mountainous country this is an important con-
sideration which seriously limits the capability of the
direct projection type instruments.
Electronic image transfer has so far been associa-
ted with instruments using the automatic image correla-
tion technique. This is due to the technology involved
and a unique flexibility in handling the geometry of the
elementary images.
The quality of electronically transferred images
is comparable to the quality of other systems as long as
no magnification in the image transfer is contemplated.
This.is.one of its. limitations... Another drawback is the
difficulty in: producing. colour pictures of a quality com-
parable to the: current. photographs, Whether these diffi-
culties are of a temporary nature remains to be seen.
Each method of the image transfer has its advanta-
ges: and limitations, which: of course can be discussed as
such. However, the results of such a discussion are only
meaningful if they are considered together with the respec-
tive orthophoto system, its basic concept, performance,