2. The Autograph required the least amount of measuring time followed by the analytical plotter, again
a close second, and the stereocomparator.
3. Five or six models proved to be the optimum bridging distance for polynomial adjustment.
4. A 2nd degree polynomial for the planimetric adjustment and a 3rd degree for the heights appeared to
be the most suitable combination.
3 When a decision is made about the instrument to be selected consideration should be given to the other
tasks a certain instrument can perform apart from aerial triangulation.
12. Ebner, H.
Germany (F.R.G.)
THEORETICAL ACCURACY-MODELS FOR BLOCK TRIANGULATION
The analytical-block triangulation (bundle method) and the block triangulation with independent models, are
the most general and most efficient methods of aerotriangulation applied today.
To exhaust the full accuracy potential of those methods, in practice, detailed investigations on their theoretical
accuracy properties are necessary and appropriate.
For the planimetric coordinates of adjusted blocks with independent models. Ackermann found very
favourable accuracy properties, particularly for dense perimeter control. Similar studies for bundleblocks made
by Kunji, Talts, Gyer, Kenefick and Kilpeld have confirmed the favourable planimetric accuracy and have
shown that without the use of auxiliary data high vertical accuracy can only be achieved establishing a
two-dimensional and relatively dense net of height control.
Those investigations were supplemented and extended to large blocks with up to 10,000 models at the Institut
of Photogrammetry at Stuttgart University. The results may be summarized as follows:
- The planimetric and the height accuracy is significantly better in bundleblocks than in blocks of
independent models.
- In the case of dense perimeter control the standard deviations of adjusted planimetric coordinates
increase only with the logarithm of the number of models.
- The height accuracy is only a function of the area density of height control, independent of the block
size.
: Sidelap of 60% improves the accuracy in all three coordinates approximately by a factor v 2 and allows,
in addition, lesser density of height control.
13. Fondelli, M.
Italy
TESTS AND OBSERVATIONS ABOUT THE ANALOGICAL
AND ANALYTICAL TRIANGULATION METHODS
THROUGH THE GALILEO-SANTONI EQUIPMENT
The author develops a short critical examination of the results obtained during these last ten years in carrying
out the spatial aerial triangulation, and points out the problems to be solved to further improve the results.
Going on with his critical examination, he mentions the actual sensitivity threshold concerning the actual
operational mode.
He describes some stability and analytical triangulation tests carried out at the Galileo-Santoni stereocompara-
tor. At last, he analyses the operational mode advised to carry out the aerial triangulation through this
equipment compared with that one already tested and checked for analogical proceeding by independent
model through the Galileo-Santoni stereosimplex mod. III and mod. Ilc.
The final conclusions allow to obtain some technical and economical information to carry out the spatial aerial
triangulation at the analytical plotter in question.
38