data on the image quality of the different orthophoto systems. Such a
study would have required additional tests and uniform photographic pro-
cessing, a rather cumbersome requirement in this kind of an international
project.
Nevertheless an attempt has been made to obtain some informa-
tion on differences in image quality as discernible in a visual inspection
of the submitted orthophotos.
The following factors of orthophoto image quality were con-
sidered:
- Image definition of suitable image detail. The reseau crosses,
which were among the finest lines that could be detected in the
original photographs, were used for this purpose. The line thick-
ness of crosses was approximately 25 um in the original 1:10 000
photographs.
Double exposures and discontinuities of linear details due to
excessive slit length.
Image blur due to image movement, caused primarily by excessive
slit width.
a. Photographic Quality of Image Detail
The reseau crosses provideda means to assess the uniformity of
the image quality over the entire orthophoto. Reseau crosses, imaged
against an even grey background (farm fields) were selected in six loca-
tions, near the four corners of the orthophoto and near the principal
points of both photographs. The line width of the reseau crosses in the
orthophoto, which included their blurred edges, was measured using a 40x
enlargement microscope equipped with a scale. This width was measured
for both lines of each reseau cross and the average values was used in
the analysis. The evaluation was based on the originally submitted
orthophoto negatives and the 1:2 500 scale positive transparencies,
obtained either by contact printing or enlargement on the Borrowdale
Cartographic Camera. The following results were obtained:
- The orthophotos produced by optical image transfer systems
generally indicated a better image quality than those produced by
electronic image transfer or by direct optical projection. Con-
verted to the original scale 1:10 000 the line width of the reseau
marks depicted in orthophotos produced on the Wild OR 1, Wild PPO-8
and Zeiss Jena Orthophot was approximately 33 um as compared with
the line width of 25 um in the original diapositives. The ortho-
photos produced on the Gestalt Photo Mappers I and II (electronic
image transfer) and the .Zeiss Ortho-3 (optical projection)