The first Earth orbiting satellite to carry an
imaging radar system will be SEASAT, scheduled for
launch in 1978. Its main purpose will be to image
the oceans, polar ice and coastal areas of North
America. Unlike LANDSAT it will not be aimed at
imaging the entire world. The image data will be
received through modified LANDSAT - ground stations.
The additional equipment to do so will require size-
able expenditures (severalMill. U.S. $ ). However,
the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administra-
tion (NASA) might be in a position to have portab-
le versions of the SEASAT radar receiving equip-
ment made available temporarily.
Table 1
Radargrammetrically relevant parameters of the SEASAT-
satellite imaging radar system
Launch
Orbit altitude
Orbit inclination
Orbit period
May 1978 (scheduled)
790 - 820 km
108? retrograde
100 minutes
Radar vavelength 25 cm (L-band)
Elevation angles of
line of sight 16.99 — 23.19
Swath width 100 km
x
Resolution along track 7 m (25 m)
Resolution across track
in slant range 8 m
in ground range 25 m
Dynamic range 50 db
Transmitted radar image data received by modified
LANDSAT stations
Recording of received data probably on magnetic
tape
Map film generation by optical or digital correla-
tion
*The 7 m resolution will in most radar presentations be
artificially degraded to 25 m to achieve equal resolu-
tion along and across track and to smooth the graininess
of the original data (multi-look mode of presentation)
Other satellite imaging radar projects which
presently are only in a planning stage concern the
exploration of the planet Venus (Rose and Friedman,
1974) and multifrequency radar images of the Earth
to be produced on board the Space Shuttle (Cohen
et al., 1975).
Table 1 summarizes those parameters of the
SEASAT imaging radar that are of radargrammetric
relevance. Differences between airborne and satel-
lite imaging radar do not concern the principle of
operation of the sensor, nor are there differences
in resolution, swath width or scale. Essential
differences relate only to the "look-angles" or
elevation angles of the line of sight, considera-
tion of the planetary curvature and various effects
of orbit parameters. With airborne radar, eleva-
tion angles are normally rather large and vary
greatly within a swath, e.g., from 400 (near range)
to 80° (far range). In a satellite radar at a
great orbital altitude, the horizon and energy re-
quirements limit the elevation angles to compara-
tively small values, and the variation of the ang-
les from near to far range is rather small (see for
example SEASAT, Table 1). This permits image ac-
quisition under almost constant look angles as
opposed to airborne radar, and might enhance the
value of the resulting imagery for geoscience
applications.
4. REVIEW OF PROJECTION EQUATIONS FOR
REAL- AND SYNTHETIC- APERTURE RADAR
The basic radar imaging and projection equa-
tions have been derived on many occasions in the
past (for example: Konecny and Derenyi,1966; Ako-
wetzki, 1968; Derenyi,1970; Gracie, et al., 1970;
Hockeborn, 1971; Leberl, 1970; Norvelle,1972;
Greve and Cooney, 1974; DBA-Systems, 1974). They
were well-established prior to 1972. However, it
might be of value to specifically review the dif-
ferences which exist in the projection equations
for radar with real and with synthetic aperture;
synthetic aperture radars have become of growing
importance during the last few years and are the
only system to be made use of from satellites.
Irrespective of the type of side-looking radar
imagery, the basic measurement to work with is the
slant range r, between the antenna and point P, and
time of imaging, t These entities are obtained
in a simple process from measurements in the photo-
graphic radar record (see for example, Konecny and
Derenyi,1966; Rydstrom, 1968; Leberl, 1972a). The
basic radargrammetric difference between real and
synthetic aperture radar is the following: for real
apertures, all points imaged at time t lie on a
surface whose orientation is defined by the atti-
tude of the real antenna; for synthetic apertures,
the orientation of the imaging surface is deter-
mined by the velocity vector of the real antenna.
The position of the radarsensor is denoted by a
vector s(t)- (x, (t) , yg (t) zg(t)); the sensorposition
is a function of time t. The velocity vector of
the antenna is the first derivative of s(t) with
respect to time t and denoted by $(t)-(Xg(t),ys(t),
2; 03. The antenna attitude, finally, is deter-
mined by the three classical orientation angles of
photogrammetry: é(t), w(t), k(t). In the following,
the time dependency will not be explicitely indi-
cated, so that s=s(t),s=5(t), etc.
A formulation for the projection equation of
side-looking radar is now (Figure 2a,b):
p*str
(1)
r = Upu + Vor t s
where p is the position vector of an imaged point
in object space; u, v and w are unit vectors de-
fining the rectangular antenna coordinate system;
r is the range-vector from the antenna to the ob-
ject point; and the auxiliary vector P=(up,vp,w )
describes the location of the object point in the
u, v, w antenna coordinate system (see Figure 2b):
u. = r sin:
P
L
Yo = (sin = Sin )?r (2)
w = -cosQr
P
where ris the "cone-complement angle." Hockeborn
(1971) calls r "squint"; it is also explained by
Graham (1975), Leberl (1972a,b; 1975a,b) and dis-
cussed in considerable detail by Leberl (1976b).
Equation (1) can be rewritten in a more familiar
form as:
# Vectors are denoted by underligned lower case
letters. The dot product is denoted by (:), and
the crossproduct by (x). Matrices are under-
lined upper-case letters.