interferometrically, introducing these errors into the design,
and computing the degraded MTF, Also a common practice at Itek
is to adjust each lens for variations in glass melt indices,
element radii, and central thicknesses from design values in
order to maximize the MIF across the field of view. For very
high quality systems, a "fine tuning" of the optics is sometimes |
done based on lens system measured wavefront data from several
field points. The lens MIF at these points are then optimized
by tilts, decenters, and air space changes of key optical elements
as determined by image analysis techniques.
MIF analysis are further used to predict operational
performance considering environmental effects such as thermal
and structural changes and image motion effects due to vehicle i
and camera dynamics.
Another MTF evaluation is used on fiber optics. À
fiber optics faceplate is composed of an ordered array of small
individual light pipes which transfer images from input to output.
Conventional methods of investigating the fiber-optics image-transfer
process utilize the spread function and the edge response as
a basis for transfer-function calculation. Unfortunately, a transfer
function calculated from a fiber-optics spread function does
not have clear meaning. A holographic method is, therefore,
employed, photographic recordings being made of the summation
of sinusoidal fringes at the input surface of the fiber optics.
From these, the Fraunhofer diffraction patterns are produced.
Because the irradiances of the narrow sinc light distributions
in the Fraunhofer diffraction patterns are directly related to
the amplitude of the sinusoidal irradiance variations, the pair
yields a fiber-optics transfer factor, and a statistical MTF,
the latter being a measure of the average performance. Tests
were conducted with techniques that provided additional infor- $
mation on lateral and rotational distortion of fibers, missing
or broken fibers, and resolution.
5.9.7.2 Limations of Image Analyses
A succinct description of use and reservations on MTF
for image quality analysis or specifically resolution prediction
follows:
For proper MIF use the system on which the analysis
is performed must be linear and a typical system (Skylab) was
shown non-linear through the first generation duplication stage.
If one uses MIF analysis for resolution prediction and good results
are expected, then each component of the system process must
be correctly modeled e.g. the duplication process would quite
likely contain non-linear paramenters, and the proper threshold
modulation curves must be used in the analysis.
=
30