Ww
que
is
in
- 551 -
4.Field measurment of spectral signature of wheat by using hand
spctroradiometer
The possibility of using the remote sensingdata to forecast
the grain yield of wheat has worldwidely investigated, such as
LACIE project. So, we have measured the reflectance of wheat canopy
and examined the relationship among spectral signature, wheat
growht and grain yield.
The test site was chosen on three different soils of a test
area of the National Agriculture Experiment Station at Hokkaido.
Eleven ten by ten meters fields with wheat, which were fertilized
by three kinds of fertilizers, phosphoric, potash, and nitrogenous
fertilizers were prepared.
Reflection measurements were performed at May 27, June 28, July
27, 1977, during the maturing period, and dry weights of wheat were
also every 25 days since seeding.
In order to avoid the effect of the soil reflectance, the
reflection from these field was always measured for an observation
angle of 30 and a solar angle of 30 from the place of 2.5 m higher
avobe the soil level.
Fig.4-1 shows the radiance factor of the wheat canopy at June
28, when wheat ears began to grow after coming to ear. From the
figure, wheat canopy on the soil where potash fertilizer was not
added, apeared lighter, and for the soil lacked of nitrogenous
fertilizer, looked darker.
Generally radiance factor at 650 nm decreased as wheat grow
thicker,and at 850 nm radiance factor decreased, so dry weight and
grain yield of wheat was plotted against the difference of radiance
factor of 450 nm and 650 nm, that IR/R value as shown in Fig.4-2
and Fig.4-3.
From those figures, both dry weight and grain yield were
Linearly varied with the IR/R value, but two regression lines of
the different gradients were drawn.
This seems to be occured by the differences of the wheat growth
due to the different condition of soil. Following correlation
coefficients were obtained.
Dry volucanic Alluvial soil Total
(SV) soil (AV)
dry weight 0.933 0.749 0.851
grain yield 0.812 0.824 0.831
The correlation coefficient of the grain yield to the dry weight
was 0.883 and a bit larger than that to the value IR/R.
It is reasonable to use the dry weight for forecasting the grain
yield of wheat, but it is not practical to measure the dry weight over
the large area of wheat. So, the value IR/R is a good index of
estimating the yield.
Fig.4-4 and 4-5 also show the relation among these three parameters
caluculated from the data on JUne 28. Both the dry weight and the
grain yield were varied linearly with the IR/R, without being affected
by the reflectance of soil, and their correlation coefficients had
higher values than 0.90.
This means that the IR/R value can be used for forecasting the
grain yield of wheat.