424
The second objective, to convert the large number of existing maps to
computer-compatible form, presented two conceptual problems. The first
related to the technology to be adopted for digitizing. While it would
be possible to digitize data at the photogrammetrie compilation stage of
map preparation, such equipment is not suited for digitizing existing
map separates and is overly restricted by the conventions of the current
mapping process. Some data categories, e.g., boundaries, are not
obtained from aerial photographs and it was not certain that efficient
procedures could be developed to allow a plotter operator to capture all
of the information needed to produce topologically structured data
files. The second problem is largely economic. Until a sufficient
number of maps were converted to computer-compatible form, the proposed
applications would not be realized, and unless the digitizing process
was rapid and efficient the NMD might incur a large initial investment
for a data base with few immediate benefits. In economic terras, future
benefits must be discounted to some degree.
Thus, the Division has adopted a number of digitizing strategies for
data capture. Basic to these strategies is a requirement to have a
rigorously defined archival data file structure for data to be entered
into the data base. This requirement was necessary to try to avoid a
plethora of data formats developed only for an immediate application or
an existing hardware configuration. At the same time, multiple types of
digitizing equipment were installed and software was developed to pre-
process the data into the standard format. Manual digitizing tables
continue to be used and can be quite effective for capture of data cate
gories consisting of many straight lines or single points. Some manual
digitizing tables are integral components of interactive editing systems.
A number of photogrammetric plotters have been retrofitted with digiti
zers to obtain the usual data categories (such as transportation systems,
drainage, and contours) that are depicted during compilation of new
maps. Digitizing was also conducted under contract where automated
line-following equipment was used effectively. The equipment used to
prepare orthophotographs has been equipped to simultaneously deliver a
matrix of digital elevations. Developmental work is underway in the
area of raster scanning of existing map separates and the editing and
conversion software needed to change this raw data into the standard
data base format.
The third objective, to establish a digital cartographic data base suited
to geographic information systems, has also presented a number of prob
lems. Like the chicken-and-the-egg riddle, geographic information
systems require preexisting digital cartographic data while, conversely,
a major part of the justification for digitizing maps is to serve large
geographic information systems that, despite much fanfare, do not appear
to exist. Many current prototype geographic information systems have
either a deceiving emphasis on color cartographies but with data of
marginal quality, or else an emphasis on (expensive) custom-developed
thematic data without a link to a general-purpose digital cartographic/
geographic data base. It appears that a great deal of theoretical
groundwork has been developed but the actual implementation of geographic
information systems into a cost-effective range is moving rather slowly.
The fourth and final objective in the NMD plan is to gradually recon
figure the conventional mapping process to take full advantage of auto
mation. The rapidly increasing capability of all types of computers and
automated equipment coupled with decreasing processing costs (more bits
for the "buck") makes this a very desirable goal especially in light of
escalating personnel costs. The previously mentioned perspective that
led to our delay in producing maps digitally is less true today. Recon-