Dual analysis of both colour and black and white photos resulted in the
most complete evaluation. The characteristics of slope, altitude and
aspect are equally recognisable in colour and black and white, but
vegetation was more clearly examined by varying hues and intensities of
colour. This is especially important in study areas such as this one,
where tree cover is sparse and the major portion of the area is alpine,
with low herbaceous and woody cover. On the other hand, black and
white photos made cliff structure more apparent and distinct form was
exaggerated by shadow. Shadows on colour photos often muddied the
colour and made the images less clear.
During analysis, it became abundantly clear that the known lambing areas
were far superior to other sites. The central Ogilvie sites were
especially unsuitable. It is unfortunate that no prime sites were
identified in that range. No record of lambing has been made in that
range (Stewart 1981) but sheep are known to be attracted to mineral
licks at the road's edge. Perhaps the sheep lamb distant to the highway.
The mountains within this portion of the highway corridor are low and
altitude was much more of a limiting factor that in the south Ogilvies.
Sites C6, C12 and C17, though, are sites were field investigations can
begin.
No field work was conducted after air photo interpretation in this study.
This does not mean that ground truthing is unnecessary. The accuracy of
the technique can only be tested in the field. It cannot stand alone.
The author's knowledge of the area prior to interpreting the photos was
important as an aid to evaluation, but does not remove the need for
field work. It is not necessary to have prior knowledge of the area to
be studied. Any investigator, armed with a good knowledge of sheep
ecology, should be able to at least order priorities for areas to be
studied in the field, or at most, pinpoint the most suitable lambing
sites in the area. And, as a result of air photo interpretation, that
field time should be reduced and more productive.
Air photo interpretation is a fast, economical and reasonably accurate
aid to the identification of critical areas of Dali's sheep habitat.
I see no reason why it cannot be extended to other wildlife species.
With careful application in environmental impact assessment, it will
hopefully permit the identification of critical areas earlier in
project planning. Then, any potential impacts can be mitigated at the
preliminary design stage, and the continuing existence of wildlife
populations assured.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author would like to thank V. Geist, G.A. Ross and R. Eccles for
the assistance.