SSION
by both
ılation were
hod gives the
id that layers
ds look almost
d steep slope
4). The layer
ion showed
. The reason
ss of a layer is
0, irrespective
| other layers
the effective
Whereas in
he case.
compared with
he correlation
sses and the
d that good
land use and
The same is
he analysis of
Alur taluk is
e 49% more
able). While
ass - suitable,
less and least
).
e map was
observed that
e in suitability
ause there is a
e current land
lity and the
isses are given
suitability map
observed and
1 is suggested
odies, barren
re classified as
uitability map
d by fractures
valleys being
Is
8.09% of the
falls under
wasteland categories such as upland (44%
of total wasteland area), deciduous &
scrub/degraded forest (39%), degraded land
under plantation crops (10%), barren rock
(2%), degraded pasture/grazing land (2%).
Out of which except barren rock, all are
cultivable wastelands. Suitability of these
wastelands with respect to ground water,
soil, slope, lineament in the area were
assessed. It is observed that majority of
wastelands are suitable to more suitable for
cultivation (Table-4).
6. CONCLUSIONS
o This study shows that GIS is powerful
tool for integrating various thematic
and other collateral information.
o The land suitability map shows that
majority of the area is suitable for
cultivation of crops in Alur taluk. The
current land use is in conformity with
the land suitability.
o Nearly 18% of the total area which is
currently wasteland can be brought
under cultivation, as majority of the
area is suitable for cultivation.
o The suitability layers generated by both
cumulative and multiplicative methods
show that there is no significant change
in the suitability classes. Hence any
one of the methods can be adopted.
7. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Authors are thankful to Shri K
Radhakrishnan, Director, NNRMS-RRSSC,
Shri S Adiga, Head, Regional Remote
Sensing Service Centre (RRSSC),
Bangalore and scientists of RRSSC for
providing necessary system support and
suggestions. Authors are also thankful to
Dr. J Krishnamurthy, Scientist, NNRMS
for his valuable suggestions. ^ Valuable
comments/suggestions given by Scientists /
Engineers of National Natural Resources
Management System Secretariat, Regional
Remote Sensing Service Centre - Central
Management Office, Bangalore and Space
Applications Centre, Ahmedabab have
helped in improving the work. Secretarial
assistance provided by Ms. B Rajamani is
highly appreciated.
103
8. REFERENCES
Berthold, C.H., M.JM. Allard, and
K.A.W. Kodituwakku, 1992. An inductive
approach for ground water exploration, ITC
Journal, 3, pp 269-276.
Burrough, P.A., 1986. Principles of
Geographic Information System for land
resources assessment, Clarendon Press,
Oxford.
ESRI, 1989. Selection of suitable sites for a
picnic park, ARC/INFO Manual Vol.1,
1988, pp 12.9-12.18.
Food and Agriculture Organisation, 1976.
A framework for land evaluation, FAO
Soils Bulletin No.32.
Gerardo Bocco, Jose Palacio and Carlos R
Velenzuela, 1990. Gully erosion modelling
using GIS and geomorphologic knowledge,
ITC Journal 1990-3, pp 253-261.
Gupta, A. K., K. Ganesha Raj, P. P.
Nageswara Rao, C.B.S. Dutt and M.G.
Chandrasekhar, 1992. An integrated
approach for development of hill areas -
Study using satellite and collateral data,
National Natural Resources Management
System (Department of Space) Report,
Bangalore-560 094, pp 1-56.
Hassan District Census Hand Book, 1984 -
Census of India 1981. pp 75-99.
Hendrix, W.G. and J.E. Price, 1986.
Application of Geographical Information
Systems for assessment of site index and
forest constraints, Proc. of Geographic
Information System Workshop, | ASPRS,
Falls Church, Virginia, pp 368-377.
Hiroshi, Y., 1988. Land resources
evaluation for agricultural development by
the use of remote sensing and geographic
information system, Report of the
Workshop on Geographic Information
System by ESCAP/UNDP RRSP and
National Research Council of Thailand at
Bangkok, Thailand, pp 37-54.
Mukund R., S.V.C. Sastry, K. Ketki, S.K.
Pathan, P.S. Dhinwa and K.L.Majumdar,
1991. A Weighted index model for urban
suitability assessment - A GIS approach,
Space | Applications Centre Report