Full text: From pixels to sequences

  
162 
to meet in the object space. Fig. 3 further shows how the method refined the orientation so that the mean 
squared distance between pi? and d? was minimized. Eight iteration loops were needed in order to achieve the 
stop criterion (relative decrease in x? less than one per mille). The remaining noise in the right picture of Fig. 
3 results partly from the interpolation error in d? and partly from the synthetic noise added to the disparities 
pi and q5. The highest peaks are nearby edges where the interpolation error is at its maximum. The weights 
W (41,71) in (11) were thus chosen to 0.5 in the edge zones and to one elsewhere in order to compensate the 
interpolation error in the outlier sensitive least squares minimization procedure. Preliminary tests with denser 
data (N = 128, M = 128) showed decreased interpolation error and more accurate orientation estimation but. 
at the expense of increased computation time. 
   
   
   
        
  
    
  
  
No 
DD 
NS 
100 E NS 1 
INE 
50 Noos 0- 
N > . 
© 0 Y N -1 
N 10 s 
  
Fig. 3. The difference d(i1,j1) — pi»(5,J1) — 42(4, 71) for (41,1) € Q before iteration (left) and after it- 
eration (right) in the case of data 2. 
6. CONCLUSIONS 
We presented two methods to estimate the relative orientation of two disparity maps obtained by a movable 
stereo head. The first method was based on modeled features and the second one on matching the disparity 
surfaces in the overlap region. In the preliminary tests with synthetic data, the first method gave more accurate 
results than the second one when the modeling was successful. On the other hand, the second method was 
capable of handling cases with lack of features. Our future plans include performance tests with real data and 
integration of pixel gray level information to the orientation estimation. 
7. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 
The Heikki and Hilma Honkanen Foundation is acknowledged for supporting O. Jokinen during this work. 
8. REFERENCES 
[1] Haggrén, H., Jokinen, O., Niini, I., and Pôntinen, P., 1993. 3-D digitizing of objects using stereo videography. 
In: Optical 3-D Measurement Techniques II, Eds. Gruen/Kahmen, Herbert Wichmann Verlag, Karlsruhe, pp. 
91-97. 
[2] Jokinen, O., 1994. Reconstruction of quadric surfaces from disparity measurements. In: Applications of 
Digital Image Processing XVII, Andrew G. Tescher, Editor, Proc. SPIE 2298, pp. 593-604, San Diego. 
[3] Kanatani, K., 1994. Analysis of 3-D rotation fitting. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., vol. 16, 
no. 5, pp. 943-549. 
[4] Niini, I., 1994. Relative Orientation of Multiple Images Using Projective Singular Correlation. Licentiate's 
thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo. 
[6] Press, W., Flannery, B., Teukolsky, S., and Vetterling, W., 1986. Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific 
Computing, Cambridge. f 
IAPRS, Vol. 30, Part 5W1, ISPRS Intercommission Workshop "From Pixels to Sequences", Zurich, March 22-24 1995 
  
  
l
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.