1061
Symposium on Remote Sensing for Resources Development and Environmental Management/ Enschede / August 1986
© 1987Balkema, Rotterdam. ISBN 90 6191 674 7
Working Group 5: Non-renewable resources
B.N.Koopmans
Liaison
1 INTRODUCTION
The Working Group was chaired by D. Mouat with co-
chairmen B. Koopmans and N. Rengers. 5 Working Group
sessions have been held during the symposium and one
combined session jwith Working Group II Microwave
Data. A total of fifteen, papers were presented oral
ly and about as much posters. During the main ses
sions, two "invited-speaker" presentations were pre
sented on Non-renewable resources topics.
The Working Group sessions were dealing with the
following topics:
1. remote sensing for regional geological mapping
and global resource assessment
2. radar application in geology (combined session)
3. remote sensing for engineering and mining pro
jects
4. various methods of geological data extraction
5. environmental hazard studies using remote sensing
During these sessions also topics as geo-informa
tion systems, geobotany, and advanced sensor/data
handling techniques were treated.
Twenty scientists participated in the business
meeting of the Working Group in order to discuss
activities of the group as well as problems and fu
ture activities involving remote sensing and geol
ogy.
2 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The recommendations from the Toulouse symposium
(1982) were partially solved by the meeting of the
Working Group in Enschede (1986).
It was agreed that the Working Group should con
tinue as an ad-hoc group. No direct activities were
planned before the Kyoto Congress (1988). With the
experience gained during the Enschede meeting it was
advised for the Kyoto meeting to programme more pos
ter sessions relative to oral presentations. The
poster sessions were felt as very informative and
allowing for ample discussions and getting acquain
ted with the different research topics in progress
in the different countries. It was also felt recom-
mendable to have more sessions directed to specific
topics of interest during the Kyoto congress and to
plein more/joint sessions with other Working Groups
covering overlapping fields of interest. The joint
session on radar and geology with Working Group II
during the symposium was felt as being successful
and recommended also for Kyoto. Other joint sessions
could be: image processing for geology, geobotany,
and thermal infrared for geology.
Concern was expressed regarding the rising cost of
satellite data, specifically with respect to educa
tion and research. New problems have arisen in addi
tion to costs. The continuity of availability of
satellite data needs to be guaranteed if research is
to be maintained.
The wish for stereoscopy of satellite data, an im
portant long-standing requirement of the geological
remote sensing community, has been partially met by
SPOT. Future research of stereoscopy with SPOT im-
agery will show the benefit of this new technique.
The different remote sensing systems remain somewhat
incompatible as far as data integration is concerned.
However, it should be realized that systems are some
what application-specific.
Integration of different data sets is felt as being
of prime importance in applications. Not only that
the remote sensing data sets should be made compat
ible, and combinations of microwave, thermal and vis
ible part of the spectrum should allow for optimal
data extraction, but also combinations with geophysi
cal, geochemical and geological field data should
allow for geological/geographical information sys
tems. These methods for data integration should re
ceive attention of the Working Group and are proposed
as future specific topic.
Other topics which have been proposed to receive
more attention by remote sensing geologists are:
1. Importance of new sensor systems (including micro-
wave, high spectral resolution systems and thermal
systems); 2. Methods for analysis; 3. Geobotany and
bio-geochemistry aspects.
Finally the importance of government policy in dic
tating the future of research and development in geo
logical remote sensing cannot be understated. It is
imperative that geological remote sensing scientists
lobby government policy makers to ensure an effective
dissemination of data.
3 SUNMARY
3.1 At the Enschede symposium, 15 papers were pre
sented and as many poster session topics of:
- geo-information systems
- lineament analysis
- mineral exploration
- geobotany
- geomorphology
- advanced sensors/techniques
- microwave remote sensing for geology.
3.2 Since the last symposium we have seen the follow
ing changes in satellite data:
- spatial resolution has increased
- spectral resolution has increased
- radiometric resolution has increased
- stereo capability
- data integration through geo-information systems
- cost of R.S. data has increased
3.3 The following problems were identified:
- lack of system compatibility
- difficulty in data acquisition
- cost of data
- cost of data processing facilities
3.4 Recommendations for future directions
- data integration and geo-information systems
- attention to basin analysis
- emphasis on exploration research
- geobotany and metal stress
- computational techniques for multidata integration
- solicitate papers from industry
3.5 Recommendations for Kyoto Working Group V:
- emphasis on poster sessions