Full text: Close-range imaging, long-range vision

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
e Feature point tracking by multi-criterions 
After the numerically distinctive points, associated with their 
descriptions, are extracted from the first frame of each test 
fields, we used image track algorithm to seek conjugate points 
in the following images with a multi-criterion method. The first 
criterion is maximum parallax constraint for determining the 
search range. A horizontal parallax of about 10 pixels (because 
we knew the resample rate of the image sequences) and a 
vertical parallax of about 3 pixels are recommended. The 
second criterion is a correlation coefficient maximum between 
window patches around the point pairs. The black crosses in 
Figure 8 show the tracked feature points in the 28" image. The 
black cross in the magnified window illustrates the location 
accuracy of the tracked point. 
* Refining the conjugate points by LSM 
The feature points used for the epipolar image generation had 
better be subpixel accuracy because even though the error 
introduced into the slopes of the conjugate lines by the pixel 
inaccuracy is small, the magnitude of the inaccuracy can be 
magnified when interpolating gray values along the conjugate 
lines (Luhmann and Altrogge, 1986; Tang and Heipke, 1996). 
Thus, we further refine the conjugate points by least square 
matching-LSM (Ackermann, 1983). The number of conjugate 
points, which can be extracted from the image sequences 
decreases with the distance from the first frame. Close to the 
first frame (e.g., the second frame), we can identified over one 
hundred conjugate points; at the last frame, we could only get 
about 30 good conjugate points. Basically, this operation 
guaranteed that all of the conjugate points were with high- 
quality, and that at least 8 conjugate points can be extracted. 
e Rectifying the original images 
Based on extracted distinctive feature points, the implied 
relationship between the original and normal images can be 
established using Equation 9. Least square estimation is 
employed to solve the 8 implicit parameters. With the implicit 
parameters, the original image sequence can be rectified into 
the normal image sequences by Algorithm 1. 
* Epipolar-plane image (EPI) generation 
In terms of the method of EPI generation (The details of 
generation of EPIs was described in Zhou et al., (1999)), the 
EPIs for the three test fields were obtained from the rectified 
image sequences. We randomly selected one EPIs from each 
test field, as displayed in Figures 9b through 11b. To compare 
the differences of EPIs, the corresponding original EPIs 
constructed by the original image sequences are displayed in 
Figures 9a through 11a. 
» DEM generation 
The ground coordinates (X, Y, Z) are uniquely determined by 
the slope and the intercept of the trajectories in the EPIs (Zhou 
et al., 1999). The DEMs of the three test fields were generated 
by the rectified EPIs and displayed in Figures 12b through 14b. 
To compare the differences, the original DEMs generated by 
the original EPIs are displayed in Figures 12a through 14a. 
3.2 Analyses of the experimental results 
e Analyses of EPI 
The EPI principle demonstrates that all trajectories in the EPIs 
should be straight lines if we successfully rectified the original 
(distorted) image sequences into normal (rectified). This 
criterion can be used to evaluate our algorithm by comparing 
the original EPIs with the rectified EPIs. 
The first experimental field (Berlin city test field): In Figure 
9a, trajectory 2 (a wide white bar) first shows a curve at the top, 
and then splits into two curves at 2/3 heights from the EPI's 
bottom. The rectified EPI shows this trajectory is indeed a 
straight line. 
The second experimental field (Schónefeld test field): The 
rectification effects in the second test field are more obvious 
(see Figures 10). For example, trajectories 1 thru 6 in Figure 
10a are segments in the original EPIs. The rectified EPIs 
(Figure 10b) show almost all of these trajectories are straight 
lines, and are neither broken nor disappear. 
The third experimental field (Werder test field): Some of 
trajectories in the rectified EPI and corresponding trajectories in 
the original EPI are labeled. The rectification effects get very 
obvious in the third test field. For example, trajectory 1 in 
Figure 11a only appears in the middle of original EPI, while the 
rectified trajectory is a continuous straight line (see Figure 
11b). 
e DEM analysis 
In order to evaluate the accuracy of the DEM, we chose the first 
and 108th images to construct a stereo pair of images, and then 
produced a DEM using  VirtuoZo v2.0  softcopy 
photogrammetric system (Supersoft Inc.). 15 ground control 
points (non targeted photogrammetric points) were measured 
from a 1:2000 scale map. The generation of three DEMs was a 
highly labor-intensive and time-consuming using VirtuoZo. A 
lot of human's edit is needed. The DEMS for the three test fields 
are shown in Figures 12c thru 14c. In each test field, we 
measured X,Y,Z coordinates for over 500 points. The variances 
between the before and after rectified DEM's are listed in Table 
1. Accuracy of the rectified DEM's was increased up to 30% in 
X, 40% in Y and 35% in the Z direct 
Table 1. DEM accuracy evaluation. The increment rate is 
  
  
  
  
  
computed by "ate = (variance, — variance, )/ before 
Test Accuracy Improvement Rate (%) | Checked 
Field X Y Z points 
31.9 328 37.0 580 
2 44.2 42.3 48.5 990 
3 27.7 30.7 44.4 1500 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
4. CONCLUSIONS 
A method for automatically rectifying distorted aerial image 
sequences for Urban 3D mapping using EPI analysis technique 
has been described in this paper. The apparent advantages of 
this method are: 
(1) The relationship between the original and the normal 
images is described by the implicit instead of explicit 
parameters. Thus the computing time consumes less than those 
of which use the explicit parameters to describe the 
relationship. 
(2) The whole rectification process is linear and, therefore, 
simpler. 
(3) The mathematical model does not need the orientation 
parameters of the cameras. It is a convenient and practical 
solution for a number of applications, such as mobile mapping 
technology. 
The algorithm developed here has been demonstrated to be 
useful in an EPI analysis applied to aerial image sequences. 
—610— 
Becau: 
elimin 
depth 
photog 
comm 
ACKI 
This 1 
Found 
IV. Cy 
collab 
Space 
REFI 
Ackeı 
Hattc 
Luhr 
Niin 
Lá, ' 
Tan, 
Zho
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.