tL 
  
ma Cai RET tti fio sn ne 
Fig. 8: Comparison of different cases, (B1! 
A Up = 2 
ag g 
es! 0 | 0 EO, C2 
  
  
801 
251 EO, C3 
201 
651 
801 
5,5+ 
  
  
  
  
  
45+ 
40+ 
i — 
[m m m emm que um umm at mo n m m em m mem mom 
  
  
  
351 
  
  
  
  
01 10 30 60 
07 71 212 424 
standard deviation of navigation data 
- 283 - 
Ple 
10,0 (ml 
70,7 [mgonl