h (mJ Fig. 1: Profile and prediction errors of Bohuslaen 
18. 
18. 
14. 
12. 
10. 
24. 
20. 
18. 
12. 
e [m] 
2.0 
1.0 
0.0 
  
| MAE i 
  
7 
250 m 500 m ; 750 m 
. it . 
-i* am am a t. + * erry? wre . M^ ° . ..* 
. M ns AMAT Ne ttn —o —Ó 4 M 
  
Fig. 2: Profile and prediction errors-of Uppland 
250 m 500 m 750 m 
+ . . * Tu . 
ra - “ a —] ^ —, — t MA tnt yv Pme» - 
« . . . y 
- Mg -