Full text: Proceedings of the Symposium "From Analytical to Digital" (Part 2)

V. Conclusion and Concluding Remarks 
(1) Experiments prove that a posteriori compensation of 
systematic errors is a method easy to use and with better 
compensation effect, when signal-to-noise ratio 2, more 
than 60% systematic errors can be generally eliminated by 
using this method, the accuracy could be improved by 1.7 
times above. 
(2) From experiments of effect on a posteriori compensa- 
tion of various systematic errors and those of different in- 
terpolation methods, some conclusions can be drawn, especially 
the relationship between benefit of a posteriori compensation 
and signal-to-noise ratio demonstrates that during the pro- 
ductive process random error ought: to be reduced as little as 
possible and signal-to-noise ratio should be raised . 
(3) During the process of a posteriori compensation, it 
would be of great importance to assess the effect of inter- 
nolation method on compensation of systematic errors. In our : 
experiments,it is evident that effect on compensation of poly- 
nomial interpolation is better than that of weighted mean 
value method. 
The disadvantage of a posteriori compensation is: during the 
computation process it is, in general, necessary to add 2-5 
iterations for the whole adjustment, thus much computation 
time is needed. : 
Table 3. Statistical table of signal-to-noise ratio and 
average benefit of a posteriori compensation 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
random |signal-to- : (1) fined (3) 
refined prog. refine rog.(2 
error noise ratio pres prog 
4m ^ j Gol 1 dep. Yigy Oz CoL Ÿ coop I c» 1] o: 
MD Cor C, Cs 7 / / / " ” v d 
« Out Top Op Cz CoL Cop P Cz 
15 1,68 | 0.635 | 3.08 | 0.80 | 1.81 1.10 | 2.60 1.16 1.86 1.33 | 2,85 (41.2; 
* 10 2.70 | 1.22! 5.89 | 1.88 | 2.55 1.88 | 4.38 1.12. | 2.5 1.42 | 4.66 | 1.87 
5 5.33 | 2.69 iio 4.35 | 3.88 1.95 | 5.64 | 2.39 4.19 | 2.04 | 6.82 | 2.08 
15 0.76 | 0.30 | 0.78 | 0.42 | 5.83 | 0.42. | O.85 | 0.56 
** 10 „40:81 | 0.63 | 0.84 { 0.60 | 0.82] 0.53. ! -0.86 10.71 
119 0.82 | 0.60 | 0.84 | 0.62 | 0.84 | 0.64 | 0.58 | 0.72 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
* improvement of rate of multiple of mse. 
** percentage of eleminated systematic errors 
-.5010* 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.