Table 4. A comparison of interpolation methods
refined program (1) | refined program (2)
maximum mean value maximum mean value
* ¥* % * ** * * * *3€
5.64 | 0.84 2.55 | 0.66 6.82 0.88 2.80 | 0.75
Table 5. Results of a posteriori compensation by using
practical materials (units- m)
| | Bystematic refined | refined
name of versieny errors unchan- program (1) program (2).
test | of adj4 gable - | |
field ; EE Os Am %H cofjsesls? EH al | %H 3, L| o2 3^ ig" | %H
sin&le |5.4io.ohr.oloz. a5 .elo. 128 13.4] 7.0132.727.0/12.6] 0.15713.4 8.732.928. 6]11.alo. 148
Enping => : » C
ouble [|:6.616. ia3.731.6]18. 70.209 [16.5 3.830. 1/28.7/13.3) 0.138]18.7] 8.129.927. 4/11.900. 149
HORDORF | double | 7.d 7.4 8.2;16.8/15.6'0. 194 | 7. 8.7 8.1:8.8j12.4 9.184 7. 8.7 8.1117.2j12. do. 154
Table 6. Statistical table of benefit of a posteriori
compensation by practical materials
name of versions| refined program (1) refined program (2)
test fld| of adj.—— — ES 7 — ———
] 221/28, dor/005| 02/5; | 03/7, 701/308] 720/07] 25/25 | 2í/c*
Enping singled vo | 1.38 | 1.18 1.25 1.01 1.63 | 1.19 1.34
double | 101 | 1.87 | ns] im] ow), er va
HORDORF double loo | 1.10 | Loo | 1.28 1.00 | 1.10 aT 1.28 |
REFERENCE
AE Li Dezen: Compensation of Systematic Errors in Block
Sdjustment of Photogrammetry.
of Surveying and Mapping.1981.
Information of Wuhan College
[24 Schilcher,M,: Empirische Analyse und Korrektur Systema-
tisher Modellfehler Beim Oeepe-Versuch Oberschwaben. In-
stitut fur Photogrammetrie Stuttgart, 1976,1
/53L Wang Zhizuo: Principles of Photogrammetry. Publication.
House of Surveying and Mapping,1979
/4. 3G. Masson D'Autume: Le Traitment des Erreurs Systematiques
dans L'Aerotriangulation. ISP Comm. III, Ottawa,1972
{5% Jacobson,K.: Attempt at Obtaining the Best Possible Accuracy
in Bundle Block Adjustment. Pres
Congress, Hamburg, 1980
. Paper of Comm. III
~ 502"
PRE ue a ae ca ee ce "A"
ISP
