Full text: Commissions I and II (Part 4)

   
ATION 
nstruments, in 
»rineiple. These 
le reproduction 
it des éléments 
se de vue. Ces 
irs qui peuvent 
e des éléments 
ireil de restiti- 
ymétriques par 
n). Des dévia- 
nent facilement 
ts de correction 
nage aprés une 
rigées dans les 
ent d'aprés le 
re aussi petites 
ions of ground points 
‚en by this record, so 
e model. 
se it is desirable to 
duced into the record 
as near as possible to 
'e of all deviations is 
ce. For this, the cause 
be found. This would 
ether the cause could 
the result of the fault 
gligible quantity. This 
economy. If the cause 
the question to be in- 
he deviations can be 
correction during pho- 
the information is in- 
he record, or during 
it from the record. 
errors we find first 
tortion. This can be 
secondly, asymmetrical 
rected by alteration of 
d asymmetrical errors 
ted. Thirdly, irregular 
'orrected. 
error arises are first, 
ive the lens distortion 
r which gives a prism 
ty and the emulsion 
and non-uniform bend- 
ier and film shrinkage. 
era we have the errors 
t glass, atmospheric re- 
  
   
GEOMETRISCHE EIGENSCHAFTEN DES BILDES, AUTHOR'S PRESENTATION S3 
fraction and earth curvature. Earth curvature 
can be regarded as a deviation from the ideal 
when a flat model is required. 
The causes of the errors are first, deviations 
from the ideal case depending on the design, for 
instance distortion; deviations resulting from 
manufacture, for instance eccentricity of the 
lens, and deviations caused by the operation of 
the camera. 
Radial distortion in modern air survey lenses 
is of the order of 5 microns to 20 microns only, 
but radial distortion can be corrected for in the 
mechanical plotter by simple means, that is op- 
tically, using correction plates, or mechanically, 
by the correction cam. The error remaining in 
the correction plates is 2 microns; with cor- 
rection plates made for the measured distortion 
of a particular camera, a residual error of plus 
or minus 2 microns is therefore to be expected 
as a maximum error. 
In practice correction plates are manufac- 
tured for a certain lens type under the assump- 
tion that the distortion is the same for all lenses 
of the same type. However, small discrepancies 
occur in manufacture which in general are up to 
5 microns in the corner. The residual error in 
correcting for symmetrical radial distortion can 
thus generally be expected to be 4 to 7 microns. 
These errors remaining after correction are 
very small by comparison with those caused by 
film shrinkage. Asymmetrical distortion is 
caused by decentering errors in the lens system. 
They originate during manufacture. When a lens 
has a decentering error the resulting tangential 
distortion cannot be corrected. One cannot speak 
of the optical axis of a lens system which has 
a decentering error. A new definition is needed 
for the inner orientation and much work has 
been done on this problem, and the residual er- 
rors caused thereby are only mentioned in pu- 
blications from Washer, Carman, Bertele, Meier 
and others. 
An attempt at improvement can be made by 
a new definition of the principal points. This is 
possible in that starting from the autocollimation 
point, the principal point can be moved further 
in the direction of the optical axis deflection. 
Such a movement represents the correction of 
a projecting error. However, the remaining non- 
projective error, for instance the tangential 
distortion, is now of the greatest importance. 
This is the distortion component perpendicular 
to the picture radius. Since it cannot be correct- 
ed for, it remains as a defect in the photograph 
and must therefore be kept down to the smal- 
lest possible quantity. Computation of these 
asymmetrical distortions and also measurement 
of the lens show that the tangential distortion 
is about one-third of the asymmetrical distortion 
referred to the autocollimation point. This 
relationship between the asymmetry in the di- 
rection of deflection of the optical axis and the 
tangential distortion is one reason why in spe- 
cification for photogrammetric camera cali- 
bration the autocollimation point is prescribed 
as the reference point for the measurement of 
radial distortion. 
By extremely careful centering of the lens it 
is at present possible to reduce a bend in the 
optical axis to as little as 5 seconds. The maxi- 
mum tangential distortion with this deflection is 
3 microns. 
The same observations concern the filter. A 
filter might have manufacturing faults such as 
a prism effect and spherical or irregular devia- 
tions of the surfaces from the plane. This causes 
asymmetry and tangential distortion like eccen- 
tricity of the lens. Present-day filters have a 
deflection of a few seconds so that the resulting 
tangentia] distortion is smaller than the meas- 
uring accuracy. 
The emulsion carrying the record of the 
image is in the ideal case a plane. This plane 
should be stable so that the distances existing at 
the moment of exposure between image points 
and from the reference of fiducial marks are 
maintained. If the emulsion carried by a glass 
plate or by a film deviates from the plane the 
result is a radial movement of the image points. 
Whereas a few years ago it was hardly possible 
to make plates with a maximum deviation from 
the plane of 20 microns, the plates are available 
today with a maximum deviation of 10 microns, 
the irregular deviations being of the order of 1 
micron. With the flexure of present-day plates 
distortions of about 3 microns are to be ex- 
pected. 
Deformations of the film combined under 
the name of film shrinkage are of very high im- 
portance and even change in the film dimen- 
sions has the same effect as a change in the 
camera constants. On the other hand, a dif- 
ference in shrinkage in the length and width of 
the film and irregularities in shrinkage repre- 
sent considerable sources of error. According to 
data supplied by manufacturers, the difference 
between longitudinal and transverse shrinkage 
caused by development and ageing is about 0.01 
per cent, that is 10 microns in 100 millimetres. 
Little has been published concerning the irregu- 
lar effects. Irregularities between 5 microns and 
20 microns are spoken of. In unpublished in- 
vestigations, I have determined from 200 se- 
parate distance-measurements each 80 milli- 
    
   
    
    
   
   
     
   
   
  
    
   
     
   
  
   
    
   
   
     
   
   
    
    
    
     
     
   
    
   
     
    
    
   
    
     
  
    
    
   
   
  
  
   
   
   
   
    
    
    
   
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.