Full text: Commissions III and IV (Part 5)

9 
Improved Stereotriangulation Ad Justments 
. o J . X 
with Electronic Computers 
ALBERT L. NOWICKI and CARL J. BORN, 
Army Map Service, L- 
Washington, D. C. 
is 
ABSTRACT: The UNIVAC plays an important role in the stereotriangulation s 
adjustment process. For this reason, thoughts are always directed toward im- 
proving the existing programs as well as devising new ones. Considerable time 
and study have been devoted to the deficiencies of the vertical adjustment pro- 
gram. The results have led to a revised program with the required flexibility. 
Work is also underway for programming a horizontal block adjustment, which 
shows considerable promise. 
N APRIL 1952 the Army Map Service ac- where 
I quired one of the first major commercial He = [1 + (a — 4 — aojalZC 
electronic computers (UNIVAC), developed C — Scale conversion factor 
in the United States for use in its Geodetic Z —Stereophotogrammetric height 
and Photogrammetric Divisions. At that time x =Stereophotogrammetric x 
programming was initiated for the analytical y=Stereophotogrammetric y 
computations incidental to the horizontal ad- Xo — Origin for vertical scale correction 
justments of stereophotogrammetric exten- a — Scale coefficient 
sions; however, the classical-graphic method He = Adjusted-computed heights 
for vertical adjustments was continued. Dur- A; & Bj; — Coefficients (2—90, 1, 2) 
ing the ensuing period additional first-order 
stereoplotting 
  
It was assumed, at the time, that the terms 
of the quadratic equation satisfied the sys- 
tematic error accumulation due to earth 
curvature and imperfect optical compensa- 
tion. The B»x?y term had been included to 
partially compensate for accidental errors. 
Inconsistencies in results led to further re- 
search and testing in order to arrive at a 
more accurate and economic solution. 
After a large number of tests, involving 
y many combinations of flight lengths, control 
spacing patterns and number of control points 
available per strip, it became apparent that 
these three factors had a definite bearing on 
the extent to which the residual errors were 
removed in the UNIVAC adjustment. For 
example, whenever the strips of photographs 
exceeded fifteen models and the distribution 
of control occurred in four or more bands, 
with each band consisting of two or more ver- 
tical control points, a “poor fit” to the con- 
instruments were acquired 
specifically for use in extension work; at 
present over thirty such instruments (Stereo- 
planigraphs, Autographs, etc.) are being used 
for that purpose. 
To date successful use has been made of 
the conformal transformation equations 
(quadratic in (x)) for the horizontal adjust- 
ment of extensions (see equation (1)). 
  
*X =x + Ka? 4+ Hx + D (2Ax + B) 
Y = y+Ax+Br+D+(2Kx4 I1), 
Steps were taken, subsequently, to program 
the mathematical adjustment of the vertical 
errors in a stereotriangulated strip utilizing 
the equation of a ruled surface (quadratic in 
(x)). (See equation 2.) 
*Ao + Boy + Ax F Bixy + Aon? 
+ Bax?y + H, = H. j 
; trol, on a least squares solution, resulted. 
The acceptable standard error of the residual 
errors after a least squares fit to the control 
was considered to be 1/5,000 of the flight 
height; this value of H/5,000 will be recog- 
* In actual computing x and y are replaced by 
V — 3) «& (y— 5) where £, ? are mean values of the 
stereophotogrammetric coordinates of the vertical 
control points in the strip. 
Presented at the Society's 26th Annual Meeting, Hotel Shoreham, Washington, D. C.. 
March 
23 26, 1960. 
  
Archives 5 
  
ri i 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.