— 
) find the 
e should 
selection 
give us 
0559.7; 
e-r- 
; Sill=s= 
ter 
rated the 
tica. We 
sets and 
5, that we 
Is a good 
lon - it is 
sively for 
ds in our 
over, our 
deal with 
me is that 
nsic data 
methods, 
> for our 
llows the 
results of 
work 
Inc., San 
Antarctic 
data and 
srnational 
VIcMurdo 
rammetry 
Yaron A. Felus 
  
Helmut Moritz and Hans Sunkel 1978. Approximation methods in geodesy, Lectures delivered at the second 
international. Summer school. Herbert Wichmann Verag Karlsruhe. 
Hongxing Liu 1999. Generation and refinement of a continental scale digital elevation model by integrating 
cartographic and remotely sensed data: A GIS approach. Ph.D dissertation. The Ohio-State University. 
Honikel M. 1999. Strategies and methods for the fusion of digital elevation models from optical and SAR data. 
International Archives of photogrammetry and remote sensing, Vol 32 part 7-4-3 W6, Valladolid, Spain, 3-4 June 1999. 
Hutchinson, M. F. 1996. A locally adaptive approach to the interpolation of digital elevation models. Proceedings, 
Third International Conference/Workshop on Integrating GIS and Environmental Modeling, Santa Fe, NM, Santa 
Barbara, CA: See: 
http://Www.negia.ucsb.edu/conf/SANTA FE CDROM/sf papers/hutchinson michael dem/local.html 
Rapp H. Richard 1984, The determination of High degree potential coefficient expansions from the combination of 
satellite and terrestrial gravity information. Reports of the department of geodetic Science and surveying, No 361 
Prepared for NASA. 
Schaffrin B.1992. Biased Kriging on the sphere?. Geostatistics Troia 92, editor Soares Amilcar,Kluwer Academic 
Publishers, pp 121-131. 
  
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXIII, Part Bl. Amsterdam 2000. 123