Full text: XIXth congress (Part B3,1)

  
Jen-Jer Jaw 
  
Yet from the prediction point of view, the closer the unknown object point is to the registered surface point, the more 
reliable the constraint information would become . The error-propagated uncertainty assessment of the surface constraint 
based on the aforementioned model does not find itself the same conclusion. Therefore a modification of the stochastic 
model compromising the likely conflict due to the imperfect analytical model is needed [Jaw, 1999]. The modification 
performs in a way such that the X,,, as shown below, reflects the deviation of the plane formation by three surface 
points from the fitting plane by all the neighboring surface points. We therefore come to the modified model as follows, 
  
? -1 
weBemAxtE, — e Y.-BnH 4X9 Bp 05s, 7B.) (5) 
where 
P. :the weight matrix of the added uncertainty; 
oo 
P, stands for the weight matrix of surface constraint after the modification; 
Due to the restricted space in this paper, the author encourages the interested readers refer [Jaw, 1999] for more detailed 
explanation of the model modification. 
3 CONTROL SURFACE IN AERIAL TRIANGULATION 
3.1 Aerial Triangulation System Formulation 
With the formulation of surface constraint model, the photogrammetric measurements can be joined into the system 
performing the aerial triangulation task. The combined model is expressed as below, 
Yı A, A, [Hern e 6 
Dum 7 = + > > 0,X , e 
Y x +m) x1 b | lo i 3C nx) fo fo | ( ) 
-1 
> 
2 12k2k) =8 of A 0 o xm) 
  
  
2. (2k-+m)x(2k +m) = - 
(mx2k ) Y oo (mxm) =s 00 Poo 
where 
y, : increments of the photo observations, namely the difference between the original observations 
and the derived observation via the approximations; 
k : number of the photo point measurements; 
p : number of the photos ; n : number of the object points to be determined; 
A, : the coefficient matrix derived from taking partial derivatives with 
respect to the exterior orientation parameters; 
A, : the coefficient matrix derived from taking partial derivatives with respect to the object point 
coordinates ; 
x, =[AX, AY, , AZ, , Aw, 
01 
Aj, » BK, ys BX 
orientation. A indicates the increment of the parameters; x, =[AX ,, AY,, AZ,, AX, , AY, AZ,.... AX, , AY, AZ 1": 
unknowns of object points; 
e, : the random errors of the photo point measurements; 
op AY, ‚AZ, ‚Aw, Aj, Ak, ]' : unknowns of exterior 
; 2 
1 
s :the variance component of the photo point measurements; 
01 
P, :the weight matrix of the photo point measurements; w : the discrepancy of the surface constraint; 
A,, is A in equation (4) plus 0 for those object points unable to find registered surface 
mx3(n-m) 
planes; 
m : number of the surface constraints ; e, : the random errors of the registered surface points; 
S, :the variance component of registered surface points; 
P,, :the weight matrix of the modified surface constraints; 
0 
  
446 International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXIII, Part B3. Amsterdam 2000.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.