Full text: XIXth congress (Part B3,2)

ent. The 
standard 
n results. 
tributions 
1 resected 
le inertial 
e need for 
| adequate 
ty control 
e block, is 
ased on in 
letermined 
oordinates 
mospheric 
'rammetric 
significant 
rt distances 
le. 
slished and 
"s airborne 
0 km north 
hotography 
calibration 
4 meters in 
ited radially 
| radially by 
lay's digital 
283 (1995)] 
‘or purposes 
indulations, 
in at MADI 
f error were 
Dean Merchant 
3.2 TIME/SPACE OFFSET MEASUREMENTS 
Coordinate differences between the GPS antenna phase center and the center of the entrance pupil of the camera lens 
(entrance nodal point), in a coordinate system parallel to the photo coordinate system, are defined as the "spatial 
offsets". These offsets were determined for the systems investigated here by the following procedure. First, the 
nominal pitch attitude during flight was re-established on the ground and the aircraft stabilized. The camera was then 
leveled and the swing set to zero. A simple laser device, oriented to vertical, was then located below the camera and 
adjusted to point at the center of the aperture of the camera lens. This position was marked on the pavement and 
subsequently located by GPS methods. This provided the local rectangular horizontal coordinates of the camera 
entrance node. For the vertical component, the vertical distance was measured to a tangible point on the camera which 
was related in distance to the entrance pupil. This distance was supplied by the camera manufacturer. These 
measurements provided some components of the vertical spatial offsets. With the aircraft stabilized, GPS observations 
were made by the aircraft system thereby provided coordinates ofthe aircraft antenna phase center. Provided the spatial 
offsets in the horizontal were within a few centimeters, the differences between the phase center and the entrance node 
were measured and provide the spatial offsets to within a few millimeters in a nominal operational environment. 
The offset in time was the difference in time between the event mark generated by the camera and the effective time 
of exposure. Modern cameras provide event markers as an electronic pulse at the mid-point of open shutter. Other 
cameras can be so equipped. For purposes of this investigation, the effective time of the event mark was measured by 
a device placed in the plane of focus and measured the first and last point of light to an accuracy of about ten micro- 
seconds. 
3.3 OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EXPERIENCES [ODOT] 
ODOT has long been interested in calibration and test of their airborne photogrammetric systems. The first test field 
was established in the late 1970s and at the time of this investigation consisted of three fields located in Ohio. The first 
is for low altitude missions and is flown at 1370 meters above ground, the second is for mid-altitude applications and 
is flown at 3000 meters, and the third is for high-altitude applications and is flown at 6100 meters above ground. 
The aircraft used by ODOT is a light, twin engine, open ported, Partenavia "Observer" and is shown in Figure 1. The 
camera is a Zeiss LMK 15/23 on a stabilized mount. Approximately 40 well-distributed target images appear on each photo. 
  
    
Figure 1. ODOT Open Photo Port Partenavia Preparing to Fly the Madison Ranges 
  
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXIII, Part B3. Amsterdam 2000. 573 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.